Book Title: Anusandhan 2000 00 SrNo 17
Author(s): Shilchandrasuri
Publisher: Kalikal Sarvagya Shri Hemchandracharya Navam Janmashatabdi Smruti Sanskar Shikshannidhi Ahmedabad

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 141
________________ अनुसंधान - १७• 132 qualities or characters-hardness and non-livingness and when consciousness is not of the nature of these two characters (i. e., cannot exist with these two), then how can it be accepted that it was born out of elements 934 If cousciousness does not exist in individual (i.e. uncombined elements, then it cannot exist in the combined elements just as (like that) oil cannot exist in sand particle. And if consciousness exists in the combined elements, then it should exist also in individual elements 35 and so on. In conclusion Haribhadra Suri maintains the view after refuting the doctrine of Bhutacaitanyavāda of the Materialists with his cogent arguments that the existence of force (Śakti), etc. in soul and of the unseen force (adṛṣṭa), which makes the possibility of sakti etc. in soul, should be accepted and this unseen force (adrsta), which is different from soul, is real and of many kinds and comes into relation with soul.36 The Samkhya makes the reply to the materialists' view on caitanya in the following manner that "the intoxicating power in liquor is a force, i. e., a tendency to motion. This force is the resultant of the subtle motions present in the particles of the fermented rice, molasses, etc. A motion or a tendency to motion, can in this way be the resultant of several other motions and tendencies." 2937 "But caitanya (consciousness) is not a motion, and cannot be the resultant of (unconscious) natural forces or motions. Neither can the consciousness of the Self, or of the organism as a whole, be supposed to be the resultant of innumerable constituent particles of the body. One central abiding intelligence is simpler and therefore more legitimate hypothesis than an assemblage of consciousness latent in different bhūtas or particles." The Samkhya philosophy maintains the view that Prāṇa (life) is not Vayu (biomechanical force) nor it is mere mechanical motion generated from the impulsion of Vayu.38 Jain Education International 938 For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274