Book Title: Tattvartha Sutra
Author(s): Sukhlal Sanghavi, K K Dixit
Publisher: L D Indology Ahmedabad

Previous | Next

Page 437
________________ 264 of being a defilement is not-open to cancellation. On the contrary, the subtle mental feeling of the form of an act of negligence itself being of the form of defilement its character of being a defilement is dependent on itself that is to say, this its character is not dependent on a gross deprivation of life or on any other external happening. Thus even if deprivation of life did not take place and even if pain was caused to no being-nay, even if, while seeking to deprive a being of its life or to cause pain to it one actually lengthened the life-duration of this being or caused pleasure to it but if the mental feeling obtaining on the occasion was evil then it is to be treated as an absolute case of defilement. Hence it is that in the technical terminology such a mental feeling is called bhāva himsā—that is, material violence-or niscaya himsā-that is violence definitively speaking. Bhāva himsā or niścaya himsā only means violence whose character of being a defilement, being dependent on itself, is not-open to cancellation during all the three phases of time. Thus when once it is understood that a mere act of negligence and a mere deprivation of life-though each of them is called a case of violence their character of being a greater or lesser defilement is as just stated then an answer is automatically given to the question whether these two are cases of violence born of an act of negligence or of violence of some other sort. And the answer is to the effect that even if not visible to gross eyes it is a mere act of negligence that is a case of violence born of an act of negligence while a mere deprivation of life is not a case of violence of this sort. TATTVARTHA SUTRA Question: If as stated just above the root-cause of violence being a case of defilement is merely an act of negligence, then by way of defining violence one must simply say that it is of the form of an act of negligence. And if this reasoning be valid then the question naturally arises as to why the definition of violence contains a mention of deprivation of life. Answer Certainly, it is an act of negligence that is in truth a case of violence, but its renunciation on the part of people at large is not possible suddenly and for the most part. On the contrary, a mere deprivation of life-even if it is a gross act its Jain Education International For Personal & Private Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596