Book Title: Sambodhi 1977 Vol 06
Author(s): Dalsukh Malvania, H C Bhayani, Nagin J Shah
Publisher: L D Indology Ahmedabad

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 270
________________ 36 J. C. Sikdar the contradiction of permanence and impermanence in this unchangeable eternality (külasthanityata) because of there being no possibility of impermanence (anityatva). Similarly, like the Buddhist Philosophy, if the Jaina system of thought would have accepted an entity as momentary by regarding each entity having the factors-origination and decay at every moment, even then the contradiction of permanence and impermanence would have arisen because of there being no possibility of permanence (nityatva) in the case of momentary change. But on the other hand, Jaina Metaphysics admits an entity as permanent-in-change without accepting it as absolutely permanent or absolutely impermanent, for reals are undergoing change, even having remained permanent in their respective categories. Therefore, Umasvati explains that the contradictory characteristics are established from different points of view (arpitanarpitasiddheḥ).40 Acarya Pujyapada clarifies this point in this way "Substances are characterized by an infinite number of attributes. For the sake of use or need prominence is given to certain characteristics of a substance from one point of view. And prominence is not given to other characteristics, as these are of no use or need at the time. Thus existing attributes are not expressed, as these are of secondary importance (anarpita). There is no contradction in what is estabtished by these two points of view.50 "Just as the same person Devadatta is a father from the point of view of his son and he is a son from the point of view of his father, just so a substanee is permanent from the aspect of general properties and impermanent from that of specific modes. 51 Hence, there is no contradiction. These two, the general and the particular, somehow, are different as well as identical" Having followed his predecessor, Akalanka deals with the problem of permanence-in change in his own manner; "When a lump of clay becomes primarily prominent as corporeal substance, then it is permanent, because It never gives up corporeality or substantiality. When that entity, having many characteristics, becomes prominent by the mode of only form (mrtpinda), while making corporeality and substantiality secondary, it is impermanent, for the mode of lump is impermanent, If only the objective elements of the 49 TS., ch. V. 31. 50 "Anekantatmakasya vastunaḥ prayojanavasadyasya kasyaciddharmasya vivakşaya prapitam pradhanyamarpitamupantamiti yavat tadviparitamanarpitam | prayojanabhävät sato apyavivak sa bhavatityupasarjan bhūtamanar pitamityucyte | arpitam canarpitam carpitanayrpite täbhyam siddherarpitanarpitasiddhernasti virodhaḥ ". Sarvarthasid dhi, p. 303. 51 Tadyatha-ekasya Devadattasya pita putro..putrāpek saya pita, pltrapek saya putra ityevamadiḥ ", tatha dravyamapi samanyarpaṇaya nityam, viseşarpaṇaya anitvamiti nasti viradhaḥ ", Ibid. 52 "Tau ca sămānyaviseṣau kathañcid bhedabhedabhyam vyavaharahetu bhavatan" Ibid.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420