Book Title: Mahavira Charitam
Author(s): Todarmal Pandit
Publisher: University of Panjab Lahore

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 30
________________ XXVIII INTRODUCTION based on the wrong conclusion that Bhavabhūtı preceded Amarasimha, for, as we now know, Amarasimha belongs to about A.D. 550,1 I side with Bhandarkar, who assigns the first quarter of the eighth century as the date of our author. I here summarize the arguments advanced by him 2 Kalbana in his Rāgatarangine mentions that Bhavabhūti was patronized by Yasovarman, who was subdued by Lalitāditya According to calculations based on this work Lalitāditya-or Muktāpida, as he is otherwise called-reigned from A D. 693 to 729 or A D. 700 to 736 But the Chinese annals represent Candrāpīda, the second successor of Muktāpida, as having received the title of king from the Chinese emperor in AD 720, while according to the Rājatarangi nī, Candıāpīda died in A D 689 As Chinese chronology is more reliable, there must be a mistake of thirty-one years in Kalhana's chronology By applying this correction to Lalitāditya's date, we shall have to assign A.D 724-60 or A D. 731-67 as the period of his reign. Yašovarman, therefore, must have been subdued after A, D 724 or 731 According to the astronomical calculations of Prof. Jacobi, based on the mention of the annular eclipse of the sun, which is mentioned in stanza 799 of Gaudavaho 4 as having happened in the year of Lalitāditya's defeat of Yasovarman, the latter was attacked in A D.731 A certain King I-cha-fon-mo is mentioned by Chinese authors as having sent an ambassador to China in A D 731 This I-cha-fon-mo has been identified with Yaśovarman, and here we have the date of Bhavabhūti's patron from a different source The Jaina Rajasekhara mentions the conversion of Āmarāja, the successor of Yašovai man, by a certain Bappabhattı between the vilorama era, 807 and 881 (=A D.751 and 755). Thus also we have A D 753 as the approximate year of Yasovarman's death. Bhavabhūtı must therefore have lived about the first quarter of the eighth century.5 9. BHAVABHŪTI'S WRITINGS. Besides his three extant plays which are universally acknowledged to be his productions—a fact which is also corroborated by his own statements in the Preludes to these works, by the uniformity of style and by the mutual repetitions-Bhavabhūtı must have composed some other works as well A native Indian tradition attributes a short poetical work, 1 Vide Dre mdischen Wörterbücher von Th Zachariae, Strassburg, 1897 See his preface in his edition of Maiatimadhava, PP XI-XVII 8 Göt, Gel Anz, 1888, Vol II, pp 67-8. * Edited by S P. Pandit, Bom Sans. Series, 1887 5 [According to Winternitz, Geschichte der indischen Intteratur, III, p. 281, during the first half of the eighth century, M]

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 ... 407