Book Title: Indian Antiquary Vol 03
Author(s): Jas Burgess
Publisher: Swati Publications

Previous | Next

Page 123
________________ ARE THE MARATHAS KSHATRIYAS OR SUDRAS? APRIL, 1874.] of importance that the question should be thoroughly discussed, and I herewith contribute my mite to that discussion, in the hope that it will be followed up by abler and more learned contributions. Dr. Wilson touched on the point once before the Bombay Branch of the Roy. Asiat. Soc. (Journal, vol. IX. p. cxliv.), but he merely noted then the existence of Kshatriya tribal names among the higher classes of the Maratha people, and did not favour Orientalists with his opinion on the question to which attention is now invited. Probably his longlooked-for work on Caste, when it appears, will furnish materials for a conclusion one way or the other. Meantime, I would suggest the pros and cons of the case as far as they have occurred to me. To commence with some standard authorities on Indian matters, Mounstuart Elphinstone (History, p. 56, ed. 1857) distinctly states that the Marathâs are Sûdras. Grant Duff, does not give a direct opinion, but states that the pure Kshatriyas are considered extinct, the Rajputs being the least degenerate of their descendants, and then goes on to observe that the Sûdras "are properly the cultivators, and, as such, are known in the Marâthâ Country by the name of Kunabi" (Hist. of the Mahrattas, original edition, vol. I. page 13). Steele, in his Summary of Custes (p. 96, original edition), mentions that some of the leading families of Mahârâshtra wear the janare and claim to be Kshatriyas, but are considered by the Brâhmans to be Śûdras. On the other hand, when we find among the Marathas numerous family or tribal names identical with similar designations still in use among the Rajputs, such as Cho hân, Powår, Jadhava, Solankhi, and Surya: van si, it is hard to believe that those who use these designations are not descended from common ancestors; and the identity of the names is still more striking when we find a Marâțhâ Powâr occupying Dhår, from which upwards of seven centuries previously a race of Rajpût chiefs of the Pram âr or Powâr tribe had been expelled. The great Marâthâ families, too, nearly all claim to be of Rajpût origin, and I The present Powårs of Dhår, however, do not claim to be descended from the family that had formerly reigned there. See Malcolm's Central India, vol. I. p. 99. + The state of Mudhal or Mûdhôl, in the Southern Ma 109 remember seeing a letter from the Raja of Sâtára to the Government of Bombay, asking them to procure for him from Û dai pûr a work detailing Rajpût rites and ceremonies, as he was himself a Râjpût. A curious legend regarding the origin of the Sâtâra and other families is given by Clunes in his "Historical Sketch of the Princes of India," p. 130, which is worth transcribing here: "By the legend it appears that the family (Sivaji's) trace their pedigree from the famous Bappa Rawal of Chittur, who reigned over Rajpûtâna in the year 134 of the Christian era. But as any accounts of his very early descendants do not belong, or are immaterial, to the Maratha history, it may be briefly observed that one of the descendants of Bhimsî, a son of Bâppâ Râwal, who had settled in Nipâl, returned to the land of his forefathers in 1442, and founded the principality of Dungarpur and Banswâdâ. The thirteenth ruler of this race at Dungarpur, named Abhisi, and styled the Maha Rânâ, left the government to his sister's son in prejudice of his own children. One of the latter, named Sajansi, came to the Dekhan and entered the service of the King of Bijapur, who conferred on him the district of Modhal, comprising 84 villages, with the title of Râja.+ Sagansi had four sons-Bajî Râja, in whose line descended the Mudhalkar estate; the second died without family; from Walabsi is Ghorpade of Kâpsi; and Sugaji, the youngest, had a son named Bhosâji, from whom are derived all the Bhonsles. He had ten sons: the eldest settled at Deulgâm, near Pâtas, the Pâtil of which, Mâluji Raja, was an active partizan under the king of. Ahmadnagar, and had a jaghir conferred on him, which descended to his son, Shahji, afterwards a principal Maratha leader under the Bijapur dynasty. He acquired in jaghir nearly the whole of what now forms the Collectorship of Punâ, together with part of the territory nov under Sâtâra; and it was in these valleys that his son Śivaji matured his plan of Hindu independent sovereignty. The second settled at Hingni; the third at Bherdi, from whom ratha Country, is still held by the lineal descendant of the original grantee. The Ghorpade of Kapsi is the hereditary Senapati of the Kolhapur Rajas, and still holds the dignity conferred on his great ancestor Santaji by Rajaram the son of Sivaji.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420