Book Title: Sambodhi 1998 Vol 22 Author(s): Jitendra B Shah, N M Kansara Publisher: L D Indology AhmedabadPage 82
________________ Vol XXII, 1998 PHYSICAL DATING AND Two sigma error = 4200 to 3800 BP Probability = 95 5% Three sigma error = 4300 to 3700 BP Probability = 99 7% Besides these probabilistic errors, there are other systematic errors Accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) technique In this technique, one measures the actual number of carbon-14 atoms present in the sample The greatest advantage of AMS dating is the sample size about 1 mg of carbon is sufficient for AMS techniques It leads to a precision of +50 years As little as 100 microgram of carbon has been dated recently Contamination The soil (archaeological debris) over the sample works as a filter to prevent contamination by younger carbon Bones from open sites are not useful for carbonate dating as there is no collagen left in tropical sites Sampling from the penphery of a mound should be avoided Caves and rock shelters minimise bone contamination ARCHAEOLOGICAL DATING Let's now discuss the role of physical dating techniques in Indian archaeological studies through the conventional categones of Stone Age, Neolithic, Harappan, Chalcolithic, Megalithic penods In addition, we have given 14c dates for some Rock Art sites, PG ware sites, NBP and early iron sites, and also dates from various old workings of gold, copper, zinc etc The calibrated dates are expressed in terms of "B C/A. D" But in the text, to avoid any confusion, only B C/A D terms have been used, though the discussion and interpretations are based on calibrated dates Stone Age The earliest Stone Age tools belonging to Homo habilis go back to 24 Myr (million years) and are expected to go further back (Semaw et al, 1997) Homo erectus has been dated to 16 Myr in Africa The only early K-Ar date in India has been reported from Bon, near Pune and goes back to 14 Myr (million years) It is a volcanic material overlying an Acheulian assemblage Bhaskaran et al (1989) have reported two groups of carbonate deposits from Saurashtra Group I has a range of 50-70 Kyr (thousand years) and Group II, 75-115 Kyr These dates have been used to define the chronology of the underlying Acheulian (early Stone Age) assemblage There are only a few 14c dates for the Middle Palaeolithic sites but they are generally too young for taking them intoPage Navigation
1 ... 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279