Book Title: History of Canonical Literature of Jainas Author(s): Hiralal R Kapadia, Nagin J Shah Publisher: Prakrit Text Society AhmedabadPage 97
________________ 80 THE CANONICAL LITERATURE OF THE JAINAS two Puvvas. As a passing reference, I may add that amongst persons who knew only 11 Angas and who were thus not conversant with any one of the Puvvas, are mentioned Naksatra, Jayapāla, Pandu, Dhruvasena and Kamsa. The last died in or about Vira Samvat 565. Then we come across the names of persons who knew Ayāra, the 1st Anga only. They are : Subhadra, Yaśobhadra, Bhadrabāhu II and Lohārya. This brings us down to Vira Samvat 683. The end of this year marked the extinction of the Jaina Āgamas in their entirety. This view, strange as it is, is advocated by some of the Digambaras, and it has led some of the Svetambaras to question the very authority of the Digambara extant works. From this exposition it must have been seen that one and all the 14 Puvvas were not simultaneously lost or forgotten but that their knowledge gradually dwindled so that by Vira Samvat 1000, the Puvvagaya became extinct. This finishes the discussion about the loss of the main section of Ditthivāya. So it now remains to note the stages about the loss of its aining four sections. But as it requires an investigation about their contents I defer its treatment for the time being, and in the meanwhile I note the various reasons assigned by modern scholars for the loss of Ditthivaya in general and the 14 Puvvas in particular. Prof. Jacobi in his introduction (p. XLVI) to S. B. E. (Vol. XXII) observes : “Professor A. Weber assigns as the probable cause of the Drishtivāda being lost, that the development of the Svetāmbara sect had arrived at a point where the diversity of its tenets from those embodied in that book became too visible to be passed over. Therefore the Drishtivāda, which contained the Purvas, fell into neglect. I cannot concur in Professor Weber's opinion seeing that the Digambaras also have lost the Pūrvas, and the Angas to boot. It is not probable that the development of Jainism during the two first centuries after the Nirvana should have gone on at so rapid a pace that its two principal sects should have been brought to the necessity of discarding their old canon. For, as stated above, after the splitting of the church in these two sects the philosophical system of the Jainas remained stationary, since it is nearly the same with both sects. As regards ethics, both sects, it is true, differ more. But as the extant canon of the Svetambaras is not falling into neglect, though many practices enjoined in it have long since been abandoned, it is not more probable that they should have been more sensible on the same score at the time when the Purvas formed their Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.orgPage Navigation
1 ... 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322