Book Title: History of Canonical Literature of Jainas
Author(s): Hiralal R Kapadia, Nagin J Shah
Publisher: Prakrit Text Society Ahmedabad

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 211
________________ 194 THE CANONICAL LITERATURE OF THE JAINAS written in two languages, but even a Samskrta stem has Prakrta terminations at times. This indicates that the Samskrta language was slowly but surely receiving more and more attention at the hands of the Jainas who wanted to popularize their literature. Cunni is written in prose, and this is another respect in which it differs from Nijjutti and Bhāsa. Bhāsa is styled as Gāhā, too, since it is composed in gāthās in Prākrta. This is what we learn from the Vyākhyā of Visehacunni of Nisiha (XX). There its author Śrīcandra Sūri, pupil of śīlabhadra, has made the following observation : " TEINE TEISTOC HVP Entegral fueftra 1" Just as we have not got Nijjuttis for all the canonical texts, similarly there are not Bhāsas for every Nijjuttia – much less for every Agama. It seems that Bhāsas were composed in the case of at least the following 11 Agamas : (1) Āvassaya, (2) Dasaveyāliya, (3) Uttarajjhayaņa, (4) Kappa, (5) Pañcakappa?, (6) Vavahāra, (7) Nisīha, (8) Pañcamangalasuyakkhandha“, (9) Jiyakappa, (10) Ohanijjutti and (11) Piņdanijjutti. For Āvassaya, there are three Bhāsas, one of which is known as Mülabhāsa. The others are known as Bhāsa? and Visesā.° There are about 183 verses in Mülabhāsa, about 350 in Bhāsa and about 4314 in Visesão. and the 85-999 ab, and br wher Dhanapāla has written Virastuti of 11 verses wherein the 1st hemistich of every verse is in Samskrta and the 2nd in Prakrta as is the case with Silavatikathā occurring in Arthadipikā (pp. 856-994) and Bhimakumārakathā, a Ms. of which exists in a Jaina Bhandara in the Punjab, and Rāmacandra Sūri, too, has written Adidevastava of 8 verses in this manner whereas Haribhadra Sūri's Saṁsāra dāvanala, Ratnasekhara Sūri's Caturvirśatistavana and Bhatti's Bhattikävya (XIII) are so composed that they can be considered to be works both in Samsksta and Prāksta and can hence be looked upon as examples of bhāṣāslesa. For instance there seem to be no Bhāsas pertaining to the Nijuttis on Āyāra, Suyagada, Sūriyapannatti, Dasāsuyakkhandha and Isibhāsiya. 3 I have included Pañcakappa in this list, as I think that it is after all a Nijjutti on a portion of Kappa. Herein there is a reference to Kālika Sūri's going to an Ajīvaka for studying the astānga-nimitta. 4 The Bhāsa on this is extint. See p. 85, fn. 2. 5 A Ms. of its Bhāsa is in Jesalmere. 6-7 See the edition (pp. 573 and 591) of Visesão with Gujarati translation. Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322