Book Title: History of Canonical Literature of Jainas
Author(s): Hiralal R Kapadia
Publisher: Shardaben Chimanbhai Educational Research Centre

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 58
________________ CLASSIFICATIONS OF THE AGAMAS 41 So it may be inferred that Pindanijjutti is an off-shoot of the Dasaveyāliyanijjutti and hence, in a way, that of Dasaveyaliya as it after all supplements the information given in Piņdesanā, its fifth ajjhayana. Similarly Ohanijjutti, too, is an off-shoot of Avassayanijjutti (v. 665) and somehow tha of Āvassaya. Consequently, if these off-shoots are not separately counted but are somehow looked upon as included in the works of which they are the offshoots, the number of the 5 Mülasuttas comes to 3. Dr. Charpentier, Prof. Winternitz and Dr. Guérinot add to this number Pindanijjutti, and thus they consider the number of Mūlasutta as four. There are persons who, instead of looking upon Pindanijjutti as the 4th Mülasutta, consider Ohanijjutti as the 4th. This will explain why I say that there is none who considers the number of Mūlasuttas as 5. Nevertheless, apparently Prof. Schubring seems to be an exception to this rule; but I think he, too, is not keen on believing or maintaining that the traditional number of the Mülasuttas is anything else but three or four. Just as there is a difference of opinion regarding the number of the Mülasuttas, so is the case with the orders in which they are en different scholars. They are : (1) Uttarajjhayana, Āvassaya and Dasaveyāliya. (2) These three works in this very order with Pindanijjutti as the 4th. (3) Uttarajjhāyā, Āvassayanijjuti, Dasaveyāliya, Piņdanijjutti and Ohanijjutti. (4) These five works with Dasaveyāliya as the last. Out of these various orders, the first is mentioned by Prof. Weber and Prof. Bühler; the second by Dr. Charpentier, Prof. Winternitz and Dr. Guérinot; the third by Prof. Schubring;i and the 4th by Bhavaprabha Sūri. It is very difficult to say as to which order is to be preferred in view of its being more scientific than the rest. If we were to examine this question from the stand-point of authorship, we may allot to Pindanijjutti and Ohanijjutti, the last place in the lot. Previous to them may be assigned a place to either of the remaining three Mūlasuttas, and their inter-arrangement may vary according to the stand-point we may take regarding their authorship. As for Dasaveyāliya, there is no difference of opinion pertaining to its authorship so far as the text embodying the 1st 10 ajjhayaņas is 1. See my Preface to D. C. J. M. (vol. XVII, pt. III) HIST.-6 Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266