Book Title: History of Canonical Literature of Jainas
Author(s): Hiralal R Kapadia
Publisher: Shardaben Chimanbhai Educational Research Centre

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 199
________________ 182 A HISTORY OF THE CANONICAL LITERATURE OF THE JAINAS commentary on Āyāra, Dānasekhara Sūri's commentary on Viähapannatti, Vinayahamsa's commentary on Uttarajjhayana etc. Besides these there are some anonymous avacūrnis and avacūris, too. Thus it will be seen that a very great number of commentaries has been written on the Agamas. But several have been lost by this time. Out of them the following may be here tentatively mentioned : (1-3)Nijjuttis on Sūriyapannati,2 Isibhāsiya and Pañcamangalasuyakkhandha, (4-5) Bhāsa and Cunni on the last of these, (6-8) Cunnis on Nistha, Mahānistha and Jiyakappa, (9) Pādalipta Sūri's commentary on Joïsakarandaga,o (10) Gandhahastin Sūri's commentary on Ayara, (11) Jinabhata's commentary on Avassaya, (12-13) Haribhadra Sūri's commentary on Āvassaya, and one on Pindanijjutti, (14) a commentary on Sūyagada, (15-23) Sīlānka Sūri's commentaries on Angas III-XI,* (24) Malayagiri Sūri's commentary on Jambuddivapannatti, (25) Maladhārin Hemacandra Sūri's tippanaka? on Nandi and (26) a commentary on Ovavāiya. 4 As already noted, Samskrta commentaries on the Agamas are here spoken of as Tīkā. This name is applicable to the Samskrta commentaries to the non-Agamika literature, too. There are other names which both the cases e. g. (1) vrtti, (2) vivrti, (3) vivarana, (4) Vivecana, (5) vyākhyā, (6) varţikā, (7) dipikā, (8) phakkikā, (9) avacūri, (10) avacūrņi, (11) arthalava, (12) aksarārtha, (13) bālāvabodha, (14) pañjikā, (15) tippanaka, (16) paryāya and (17) chāyā. Out of them the avacūri and the following are not big commentaries; but they are more or less explanatory notes. This finishes the discussion about the commentaries of Āgamas. So I shall now say a few words about those who have written super-commentaries. Kotyācārya is perhaps the 1st amongst them in case we neglect Bhāsas and Cunnis and the extinct Tikās. He has written a Tīkā on Vićeśā, a commentary on 1. See D. C. J. M. (vol XVII, pts. I-III). 2. Quotations from its Nijjutti are given by Devabhadra Sūri in his com. on Sangrahani, a work of his guru Śricandra Sūri. See Mr. M. D. Desai's work (p. 254) noted on p. 147. 3. He is the author of Kälajñāna, Praśnaprakāśa, Nirvanakalikā etc. 4. See (p. 26) of Malayagiri Sūri's com. on it. 5. Sīlänka Sūri in his com. (p. 1a) on Sūyagada says: "21CITHSHE Fut qen;" Believing that this com. is not a Cunni, I take it to be extinct. 6. In Catalogue of Mss. at Jeselmere (p. 19) it is said : " Heeft ied" If this inference is correct, this name should be dropped. 5 7. See D. C. J. M. No. 1099. 8. I have excluded from this list Jinabhadra Gani's com. on Višeśão since there is a Ms. of this work in Jesalmere. Vide Catalogue of Mss. at Jesalmere (p. 19). * See page 212 of addition. 55 See page 213 of addition. See page 213 of addition. Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266