Book Title: Dharmottar Pradip
Author(s): Dalsukh Malvania
Publisher: Kashiprasad Jayswal Anushilan Samstha

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 28
________________ INTRODUCTION xiii foot-steps are being followed even to-day in the Navya-nyaya school. Vedanta also did the same. The Vedanta-paribhasha and the like are its fruits. As regards the Jainas, they have mostly composed works on logic since their entrance into the philosophical field. The Nyayavatara of Siddhasena, the Nyaya-vinischaya of Akalanka, the Pramana-pariksha of Vidyananda, the Parikshamukha of Manikyanandi and the Tarkabhasha of Yasovijaya, are some of the Jaina works on logic. As a result of the emphasis on the exposition of pramanas in the works on logic the discussions on jatyuttara and nigrahasthana that were considered as the primary ones in ancient logic, became secondary in the Medieval Age. Moreover the method of the jatyuttara 'was considered as improper. Dharmakirti through his Vada-nyaya criticised the method of jati and nigrahasthana and proved them to be futile. In his Nyaya-bindu, he wrote only one sentence to condemn jatyuttara and showed that jatyuttara is not a defect (dushana) but a fallacy of defect. In logic, when we analyse the nature of svartha-anumana (inference for one's own self) and parartha-anumana (inference for others), the analysis of jatyuttaras becomes easier and their futility becomes apparent. It is, therefore, natural that the importance of the discussion of jatyuttara should lose its significance. The main line of demarcation between ancient and medieval logic consists 'in the fact that whereas in ancient logic the discussion of jati and nigrahasthana occupied primary place, it became secondary in the Medieval Age. The great popularity and prominence of the study of Nyaya in Medieval Buddhism is clearly demonstrated by the fact that it produced more first class works on Dialectics than upon the nature and realisation of Nirvana. If there is any maturity in the works on Sunyavada or Vijnanavada, it is due to their methods of logical treatment. The clever exposition of the Vijnanavada and the Sunyavada became possible only with the help of dialectics. Even the refutation of the logical process could be supported only by logical method. The works composed on logic in medieval period formed a separate class, so important

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 ... 380