Book Title: Tattva Kaumudi
Author(s): Oriental Book Agency Poona
Publisher: Oriental Book Agency Poona

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 43
________________ INTRODUCTION 33 verse. It is not the God; since it is said to be without intelligence, mere dead Matter equipped with certain potentialıtıes due to the Guņas. In short, Prakrti is the one rootless Root of the Universe (objective as well as subjective) imbued with the three Attributes and evolving through these, every kind of entity-save the Purusa, Spirit. The next point that we have to consider is---How do the Sārökhyas prove the existence, the rootlessness, and eternality of this Prakrtı? Is it necessary to postulate such a rootless root, itself unmanifested, and yet manifesting all objective and subjective entities? Proofs of this are given at length in all works on the Carikhya Philosophy, and it will not be altogether out of place here briefly to sum them up. But before we take up this, it is necessary to explain the Sānkhya doctrine of causality, the point on which rests the whole fabric of the system. What then is the cause and how is it related to the effect? Cause is defined as a substance in which the effect subsists in a latent form.. Thus the effect must be said to be eternally existent-primarily in a latent condition, in the cause, and latterly manifesting itself and then commonly recogrized as the effect. How to prove that the effect has been lying latent in the cause and has not been newly prcduced by the cause ? Firstly.-What is a nonentity can never be made an entity. That is to say--that which has never existed can never be brought into existence. What remains to be done by the operation of the cause is the manifestation of the effect-that is to say, its manifestation as the effect of the particular causc. And this kind of manısestation we find in the produclion of oil from the different oil-seeds wherein it has been hitherto lying latent. Secondly.-We find that the effect is always in one way or the other related to the cause. Now, this relation would not be possible if the effect were a nonentity :

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329