Book Title: Tattva Kaumudi
Author(s): Oriental Book Agency Poona
Publisher: Oriental Book Agency Poona

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 184
________________ TATTVA-KAUMUDĪ (96) 'Objection':-"How can you assert the Spirit to be the reverse' of the Manifest and the Unmanifest; Objection-There when we see that there are points of similaare points of simi larity also beween rity between the Spirit and the Unmanifestthe soul and the such as being without cause', 'eternal' Manifest as well as the Unmanifest and so on-as also between the Spirit and the Manifest-such as being multiform' ?" 44 [X.96 Answer: 'Yet also similar';-that is to say, though there are points of similarity, such as being without cause' and the rest, yet there are points there are points of of dissimilarity also, in the form of being similarity as well as of dissimilarity devoid of the three Attributes and the rest. The objection conceded to (97) The Manifest and the Unmanifest have been described as having 'three Attributes'.* Now the question arisesWhat are these three Attributes, and what is their characteristic. The author answers this question in the following text: " *This word 'Attribute' requires some explanation It stands for the Gunas of the Samkhyas-a term denoting the constituent elements of Nature or Primordial Matter;-as says Colebrooke-" These three qualities are not mere accidents of Nature, but are of its essence and enter into its composition. On this Davies remarks- Nature or Primordial Matter is described, in the system of Kapila as formed by the Gunas, which were primarily in equilibrium, and so long as this state existed. there was no emanation into separate forms of matter." And, as we shall see later on, this inert condition of Nature is disturbed by the subsequent predominance of the Attribute of Rajas. Davies has rendered this im. portant word-'Guna'-by 'Mode'. This is apt to mislead. For Mode, as understood by Western philosophers, is an affection of a substance, quality which it may have or not, without effecting its essence or existence." The Guna of the Samkhyas, however, is almost the reverse of this-it belongs to a substance as constituting its very essence. I have preferred to translate Guna as Attribute'-using the latter term in the sense imparted to it specially, by Spinoza, who thus distinguishes between Attribute and Mode: "By Attribute, I understand that which the mind perceives of substance as constituting its essence; by Mode, I understand the affections of substances, etc." a

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329