1S. meer stem
35
ta. teed wyerafqerareasnay
[e.| arargzde afaya geet gaa siti, mate
gaan ways geet gad sditfa ? arargrere afra® gaat
gra adits ot merngaan afrga geet geet satel
[?.] erage afayaea efaaat gee sdttfa, satay
grew aferren gheant gra saRa ? arargedtn afar
gfraat gre ARAL gear a armeet at [3.] aad gant
gad wae, aed geal qa TAR? aed qadl gad
sate, wrargraa afayoen sate, at ward gait ga
skis, aa yaa wo gezer fae zee |
[e} erat ga & afirga fa oe get goa at setewear 2?
sara ga a ahaa Ge gt gt a fea wear a? gat
afar(ahaa) at oe gel gt sh géifeashea wear 81 mara
Heer gos & venga BIA ae gad gia ah Stee ae aT Pa
[2] ga-ga 8 fsa gdioa gr a) sdifea 3
qa ada getwa ge at fea wet 8? wag& ‘ifesaa
gam #1 aaifer Bra & ? sae ae saree gata See at oe
[3] getora (aera) gaat adtom wear 2) pai
ara afes qa at sateen sear 2? gett mea ge #1 waa erAT
@? ara gal & aferwat ot dt adem evar 81 pelt goer eat
a adenagi ear ay
fet seg aa ahs Ta
1, Isunhappily resultant desert rendered manifest m case of
anoverly happy subjact whoselatencies had it in store ? Oris such the
destiny of the individuals who are overly unhappy ? A happyself
oppressed by an unhappy aftermath and a self oppressed by unrelieved
anguish do not tigger the chain of manifestation of unheppydestiny.
Unhappyselves oppressed by an untappy trait of happiness witness the
manifestation of unhappylatencies. Same isthe case with selves thal
suffer unhappiness on account of unhappy desert as yet latent. The
statement aboveis an answerto respective moral queries.
