Book Title: Studies in Jaina Philosophy
Author(s): Nathmal Tatia
Publisher: Jain Cultural Research Society

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 165
________________ 128 PROBLEM OF AVIDYA [CH. born blind, and unfamiliar (with the right path), sometimes treads upon the right path and sometimes upon the wrong, so does the fool, ignorant of the world (samsāra), sometimes commit puñña (good act) and sometimes apuñña (bad act) in the world. But when he knows the reality (dhamma) and attains the truth his ignorance ceases, and he roams unperturbed.' With the cessation of avidyā, trsnā (craving) naturally ceases. If the truth is known desire for the illusory cannot exist. One seeks for permanence so long as the truth of impermanence does not dawn upon him. Ego-centric activity ceases when the falsity of the notion of a static self is comprehended. Desire for happiness disappears when the truth of universal suffering is realized. Avidyā consists in mistaking suffering for happiness, an ever-changing aggregate of vedanā (feeling), vijñāna (consciousness), samjñā (coefficients of consciousness) and sarskāras (predispositions) for an abiding ego, perpetual fiow for unchanging staticity. But if this perverted outlook ceases, tysnā (craving) naturally disappears. This is the general outlook of Buddhism towards avidyā. But along with the development of thought, it was but natural that the meaning of avidyā should change. Avidyā means ignorance or wrong cognition of truth, and hence its meaning would naturally change along with the change in the conception of the nature of truth. It, therefore, follows that the meaning of avidyā cannot remain constant. Let us now see the nature of avidyä in later Buddhist thought. We shall begin with the Vijñānavādins. The Buddhists distinguish between the samurti satya (empirical truth) and the paramartha satya (transcendental truth). The function of samurti is to cover the knowledge of the truth. Samurti covers the real nature of truth and reveals it only as covered by itself, and is also called avidyā (ignorance), moha (delusion), and viparyāsa (perversion). The Buddhists further distinguish three characteristics (laksana) or natures (svabhāva) of a thing viz. (I) parikalpita (imagined), (2) paratantra (dependent), and (3) parinişpanna (real or true), sometimes briefly called kalpita, tantra and nişpanna respectively.* Vasubandhu gives 1 Visuddhimagga, XVII. 119. 2 Cf. dve satye samupäśritya buddhānām dharmadeśanā. lokasamvrti-satyam ca satyam ca paramārthatah.-MK, XXIV. 8. duve saccāni akkhāsi sambuddho vadatam varo sammutim paramattham ca tatīyam nūpalabbhati. Quoted by Buddhaghoṣa in Asthakatha on KV, p. 30. For further references see AS, p. 162, footnote 5. 3 Cf. samvriyata āvriyate yathābhūtaparijñānam svabhävävaraņād ävịtaprakāšanāc cä 'naye 'ti samvrtih avidyā moho viparyāsa iti paryāyāḥ-BAP, pp. 352 ff. 4 Cf. buddhyā vivecyarnānam hi na tantram na 'pi kalpitam nişpanno nā 'sti vai bhāvaḥ katham buddhyā prakalpyate. -LA, X. 374. kalpitaḥ paratantraś ca parinişpanna eva ca-MVS, I. 68-b. Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366