Book Title: Studies in Jaina Philosophy
Author(s): Nathmal Tatia
Publisher: Jain Cultural Research Society

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 199
________________ 162 PROBLEM OF AVIDYA XI CRITICISM OF THE NYAYA-VAISESIKA CONCEPTION OF AVIDYA Jain Education International The Nyaya-Vaiseṣika conception of avidya also is vitiated by a number of defects. Knowledge is only a transient quality of the soul, produced by soul-mind contact. Emancipation means permanent destruction of the specific qualities of the soul such as knowledge (buddhi), pleasure (sukha), pain (duḥkha), will (iccha) and the like.' Wrong cognition (mithya-jñāna) of the twelvefold objects (prameya) is the condition of worldly existence and the right knowledge of them leads to emancipation. In emancipation, however, there is neither wrong cognition nor right knowledge. Right knowledge destroys wrong cognition and disappears itself, being as much a transient quality of the soul as the wrong cognition. The worldly existence lasts so long as there is the delusion of the indentity of the soul with the body, sense-organs and the like, and comes to an end when the true nature of the body, the sense-organs etc. is comprehended and the soul loses attachment to them due to the knowledge of its separate identity from the things of the world. Wrong cognition causes attachment to the world while right knowledge removes it. Wrong cognition degrades the soul to the status of matter, while the right knowledge reinstates it in its own status. But now the difficulty is: How can a passing quality bring about such momentous result? If knowledge is only a transient quality quite separate and distinct from the soul, is it reasonable to maintain that it is the condition of emancipation? Properly speaking, knowledge has very little to do with the nature of the soul. In spite of the fact that the Nyaya-Vaiseṣika regards the qualities of knowledge, pleasure, pain etc. as exclusively the properties of a soul, it cannot be said that these qualities constitute the nature of the soul. How can what is alienable constitute the nature? What remains if the nature is alienated? Knowledge is not the nature of the soul, because it is alienable from the soul. Wrong cognition and true knowledge quâ qualities of the soul have the same status. The latter supersedes the former, and disappears itself when the soul gives up its relation with body and mind and attains emancipation. It is difficult to conceive [CH. 1 Vide supra, p. 112. 2 Cf. atma-sarire-'ndriya-'rtha-buddhi-manaḥ-pravṛtti-dosa-pretyabhava-phaladuḥkha-'pavargās tu prameyam (NS, I. 1. 9.). Vatsyayana, commenting on this sutra, says: asty anyad api dravya-guna-karma-samanya-viseṣa-samavāyāḥ prameyam tad bhedena ca 'parisankhyeyam. asya tu tattva-jñānād apavargo mithyä-jñānāt samsara ity ata etad upadiṣṭan viseşena iti. 3 Vide supra, p. 106. For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366