________________
60
34 66/3, jang-fiatok 2013 religious. There are fault lines before each cultural zone. These Faultlines segregrates one culture from another. One cannot cross from one culture to another. The faultline become a danger point. Historically some day this difference should go and world become one, other wise conflict will arise. Many of the scholars today as Huntington are of the opinion that these traditional culture zones are there, they will be there, they have survived, they will be living unless you create a hatred for others, Huntington's faultlines can be retermed as exclusive outlook that dominates the religious (cultural) other.
According to Rhonty-there is a question of cultural identity. They remain segregated from other for this identity. Cultural conflict is not a easy problem. It is gone deep in human society and becoming complex day by day. In such a situation the phenomenon of interculturality holds utmost imprtance.
PART-B
Interculturality is a multi-faceted phenomenon. In a metalinguistic discussion, it functions as a constuct. In the field of purely formal disciplines, it stands for internationalism of scientific and formal categories. The concept of interculturality in the present context stands for a mental and a moral category. It is not to be identified with culturality of a particular culture, and it is not an eclecticism of manifold of cultures. It is also not to be equated with mere abstraction. We cannot fix the nature of Intercultural philosophy just as per delination, likewise it is also wrong to misread interultural philosophy as just a matter of aesthetization. It must not be confused with cultural romanticism and exoticism in its positive import.
Intercultural philosophy is a name of philosophical conviction, an attitude, an insight that asserts the 'no philosophy is' The philosophy', no culture is ' The culture' no truth is 'The truth'. Such an insight accompanies all the philosophies and cultures
