Book Title: Pravachansara
Author(s): Kundkundacharya, A N Upadhye
Publisher: Manilal Revashankar Zaveri Sheth

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 19
________________ ID PRAVACANASAKA, it is from him that Vírasena studied the Siddhānta, and returning to Vātagrăma from Citrakūța, composed the commentary that came to be called Dhavalā. - This Elācārya cannot be the same as Kundakunda, because in some of the preceding verses, namely 160-61, Indranandi refers to Padmanandi of Kundakundapura, who, I think, is the same as our Kundakunda, that he wrote an exhaustive commentary, Parikarma by name, on the first three sections of Satichandāgama. Besides we know of one more Helācārya, perhaps a provincial pronunciation of the name Elācārya, a master of mântric lore, of Drāviţa-gaña, a resident of Hemagrāma in the South.' He was mainly responsible for the contents of Jvālinimata, a tāntric work, composed, mainly based on the old work of Helācārya, by Indranandi Yogīndra in S'aka 861 2. e. 939 A. D. From the way in which Indranandi speaks of Helācārya it appears that Helācārya lived pretty long before, though there is no evidence to identify him with the teacher of Vírasena referred to above. That Kundakunda had a name Elācārya must remain unproved till some other evidence or independent tradition is coming forth, because the wholesale genuineness of the tradition that Kundakunda had five naines has been suspected to be of doubtful authenticity as seen from the attribution of the name of Vakragrīva to Kundakunda. GạDHRAPICCHA AS A NAME OF KUNDAKUNDA DISCUSSED.--Now the last name Gğdhrapiccha. It is learnt from S'ravaņa Belgola inscriptions, ranging from 1115 to 1398 A. D., that Grdhrapiccha was another name of Umāsvāti, the author of Tattvärthasūtra ;- and some of these inscriptions indicate that at times the name Grdhrapiccha was enough to mention Umāsvāti, of whom, therefore, Gțdhrapiccha might have been a very popular name. In some of these records the name of Umāsyāti, with the other name Gựdhrapiccha, comes immediately after the mention of Kundakunda's nam If Gędhrapiccha was a name also of Kundakunda, or if it was a name commoir to both Kundakunda and Umāsvāti, we expect that the inscriptions, in the ordinary course, should have referred to that. There was some speciality in Umāsvāti's being called Gưdhrapiccha, and that has been referred to in S'ravana Belgola inscription of 1433 A. D.: the great saint Umāsvāti helon to the holy family of Kundakunda, and being expert in all the dogia, compressed the range of Jaina doctrines in Sūtras; as a saint particular about the protection of living beings, he carried, as the report goes ( kila ), feathers; and since that day he came to be known, among the as Grdhrapicchācārya. The name should not be looked upon a all, because there have been Jaina authors bearing the names E and Mayūrapiccha, the first especially was a direct disciple of Um 1 See Anekānta Vol. I, p. 427 etc.; Catalogue of Sanskrt and Prakrit Mss, in C. Berar, Iatro. p. XXIX. 2 E. C., II, 127, 117, 140, 64, 66 and 254, 3 E. C., VI, 258. 4 E. C., II, 64, 66 etc. -5 E. C., II, 258; also the introductory verses of Kanarese Dharina-pariksă, three Grdhra. Balaka- and Mayūra-piccha are mentioned.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 ... 595