Book Title: Madanrekha Akhyayika
Author(s): Jinbhadrasuri, Bechardas Doshi
Publisher: L D Indology Ahmedabad

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 51
________________ form gave up all pretence of being a prose-work with occassional verses and became one in which prose and verse balanced in their proportions.84 Dr. C. Kunhan Raja has observed that the admixture of prose and metrical passages in more or less equal proportion became a special pattern of literary art in Sanskrit known as the Campū, but much need not be said about this pattern since this is only a combination in the same type of the features of the Maha Kāvyas (Grand Epics) like the sišupālavadha of Magha or the Naişadhiyacarita of Śni Hassa and the features of Gadya (Prose) form in poetry like the Kādambari of Bāna and the Vasavadatta of Subandhu,85 Interestingly enough, both Hemacandra and Vāgbhatta unanimously cite the Vasavadatta and the Damayanti-kathā as illustrations of Campū; and we know for certain that the Vasavaddattā is rather a 'Kathā' than a 'Campū', while the Damayanti-katba is 'Campu' rather than a 'Katha'. Shri Dolarray R. Mankad38 has rightly said that the 'Campū' form is related on the one side with drama (rūpaka) and on the other side with Katbā' and 'Akhyayikā', since while on the one hand it resembles drama as a mixed genre utilizing both prose and verse, on the other hand it resembles 'Kathā' and 'Ākhyāyikā' as a romance utilizing the story and descriptions narrated in prose and verse abounding in long compounds. But while there is action and suspense in both a drama and a Katha; they are conspicuous by their absense in a Campū. On the contrary both Akhyāyikā and Campū resemble in their narrative style and a simple plot running in a straight chronological order. It, thus, seems that the fact of a subject-matter being either invented or historical no longer served to distinguish a Katba, Ākhyāyiika and Campū from one another, since the very same story could be treated in any one of the literary patterns. And in view of the fact that Madanarekbā, the central figure of the MRA, has been regarded as a historical personage, it is possible that Jinabhadrasūri might have been prompted to call his work an Akhyāyika, thus claiming for hiinself the credit of having composed a literary piece which, being a mythologico-historical biography, was both an Akhyāyikā and a Campū simultaneously or a content of an Ākhyāyikā in a Campū form. VIII : Socio-Cultural Data : As the story of the MRA centres round but one vital event in the life of the central character, the scope for a variety of concrete incidents and their description has become limited. The major portion of the plot 34. NHSL, p. 397. 53. SSL, pp. 216-217. 36. Nvd., pp. 117 ff. Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org


Page Navigation
1 ... 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304