Book Title: Epigraphia Indica Vol 09
Author(s): E Hultzsch, Sten Konow
Publisher: Archaeological Survey of India

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 201
________________ 154 EPIGRAPHIA INDICA. (VOL. IX. There are at Vimala's temple several short inscriptions of members of this family, likewise dated in the (Vikrama) year 1378. And there is a longer inscription of the same family, No. 1791 of Mr. Cousens' List, which is dated, in words and figures, in the Vikrama year 1309. This inscription contains 25 lines of writing with 15 verses, and records the installation, by Anandasari, of an image of Nēmijina (Nêminatha) at Vimala's vasahika. We learn from it that the family belonged to the Uka[68] vania, and that its founder, Jelháka, as he is there called, was an inhabitant of Måndavyapura (Mandor). After Kuladhara it mentions five sons of his, but as the text is partly effaced, I am not at present prepared to give their names from the ink-impression at my disposal. The remaining verses (39-42) of our inscription record that Rishabha was installed (or rather re-installed) on the mountain Arbuda by the guru or súri Jhanachandra, on a date in the (Vikrama] year 1378. Regarding the spiritual lineage of Jñanachandra, we learn that he was preceded by Amaraprabhasuri, and that the founder of the lineage was Dharmastri, also called Dharmaghôsha-gapäryaman, i.e. Dharmaghosha, the sun of the gana," who defeated Vadichandra and Guņachandra, and caused the awakening of three kings. Other inscriptions of the (Vikrama) year 1378 speak of Jñanachandra either as being in the paffa of Dharmasari' or as being in the paffa of Dharmaghoshasari ;" and an undated inscription, No. 1796 of Mr. Couseds' List, commences with the words : SrimadDharmaghoshasuri-paffd bri-Ana(na) idasuri-fri-Amaraprabhasúri-paff& fri-Jadnachandrasûri-. The Ânandasari of the last must be the Anandasûri mentioned above with a dato in the Vikrama year 1309; and the Anandasúri and Amaraprabhasari of the inscription apparently are the Anandasûri and his disciple Amaraprabhashri who, according to Prof. Peterson's Fifth Report, p. 110, 1. 1, are mentioned in & manuscript written by Amaraprabhasûri's advice in tho Vikrama) year 1344. Before Anandasuri there is mentioned, ibid. p. 109, Dharmastri (a disciple of Silabhadrasuri of the Råja-gachchha), who to the pride of conceited disputants was what the lion's roar is to an elephant, and who put an end to the intoxication of the king Vigraha. And the same person is mentioned, ander the name Dharmaghôshasari, in Prof. Peterson's Third Report, App. pp. 15 and 307, where he is represented as enlightening the king of Sakambhari; and ibid. p. 262, where he is said to have defeated disputants in the presence of the king of the Sapadalakshe country. From all this there can be no doubt that, of the three kings who in our inscriptiou are spoken of as having been awakened by Dharmasuri, one was a king Vigrahardja of Sakambhari (the capital of the SapAdalaksha country). In fact, I believe that that king is identical with Visaladêva-Vigrahardja, whose Delhi Siwalik pillar inscriptions (No. 144 of my Northern List) are dated in the Vikrama year 1220 (in A.D. 1164), and that Dharmaghoshasuri himself is a person of that name who in a short Vimala temple inscription (No. 1906 of Mr. Cousens' List) is mentioned with a date in the [Vikrama) year 1226 (in A.D. 1170). Who the two other kings were I do not know ; nor have I identified yet Vadiohandra and Gunachandrs who were defeated by Dharmasdri. The date given in verse 42 is Monday, the ninth tithi of the dark half (sili) of Jyêshtha in the year made up of the vasus (8), the munis (7), the gunas (3) and the moon (1), i.e. the (Vikrama) year 1378. Here there is the difficulty that the word siti, which I have translated by the dark half,' might equally well denote the bright half'; and at first sight the latter interpretation might really seem to be preferable, because in line 30 of our text the date is repeated 1 This is the inscription referred to in 4. Res. Vol. XVI. p. 311, in the words: "Another (vis. inscription), in like manner, shows a date 8. 1809, but nothing else." · I.e. the Oravila tribe ; compare Ep. Ind. Vol. II. p. 40. Nos. 1769, 1822 and 1868 of Mr. Cousens' List. • Nos. 1756, 1758A, 1764 and 1793 of Mr. Cousens List. . There is a Vadiobaodra who composed the Judnardryodaya ; I do not know whother he is the man mentioned in our inscription.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498