Book Title: Sruta Sarita
Author(s): Jitendra B Shah
Publisher: Shardaben Chimanbhai Educational Research Centre

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 139
________________ 130 5. 7-15). Here we can mark that the version of VP is the base for BP version. The occurrence of the Rṣabha story in the Purāņas in the context of the origin of Jainism and Buddhism, both of them opposing the validity of the Vedas, proves that these Purāņas have adopted the story from the Jaina sources. Both of these Purāņas though against Jainism and Buddhism are unanimous in praising an unattached way of life and they adopt the theory of nonviolence, non-attachment and equinimity as is preached by the Jaina Tirthankaras. They are opposed to the Jainism and Buddhism only for their nonacceptance of the validity of the Vedas. ŚRUTA-SARITĀ There was no way but to accept Rṣabha and Buddha as an incarnation of God because nothing in this world happens without the will of God and none can deny the fact that they were great persons held in high esteem by the general public and so they were accepted as incarnations of God. V. Comparison of Paumacariya of Vimala (PC) and Avaśyaka Niryukti (AN) In the next stage we find the sectarian bias of Śvetāmbara and Digambara in the story. So it is proper that before we discuss those books pregnant with bias Paumacariya of Vimala should be discussed and compared with AN as it is certainly earlier than those books and also it contains some of the peculiarities of both the Svetāmbaras and Digambaras. (Paumacariya, Intro. pp. 18-21). Generally in Paumacariya (3, 4, and 20) the story is the same as it is in Avaśyakaniryukti (AN). Paumacariya mentions : Jain Education International Aummi thovasese mihunam janiūna pavaralāyaṇṇaṁ / Kālam kāūņa tao suravarasokham puna labhanti // (3.39) This theory of Mihuna or the birth of twins also called jugalia is also accepted by AN (188), Vasudevahindi (p. 157) and Ravisena (PP. 3. 51). But this is not accepted by the Jinasena in his MP. But about Kulakaras AN (148) is not clear as to whether all of them were of the same lineage i.e. the descendants of the first Kulakara, while Vasudevahindi clearly mentions as such (pp. 157-8). Both the AN and VH accept seven Kulakaras beginning with Vimalavāhana and ending with Nabhi. (also Samavāyānga 246). But Paumacariya accepts 14 kulakaras (3.50-6) and it is not clear that they belong to the same lineage. Same is the case with Ravisena (PP. 3.74-88). Jambudvipaprajñapti also differs and says For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310