Book Title: Nyayavatara and Nayakarnika
Author(s): Siddhasena Divakar, Vinayvijay, A N Upadhye
Publisher: Jain Sahitya Vikas Mandal

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 75
________________ *44 Siddhasena and his Works Hemacandra refers to Siddhasena as the greatest poet, but no epic or poem of Siddhasena is known to us. A comparative study of his Dvātrimśikās with the works of Kalidasa and Asvaghoṣa will easily convince the reader that there is close similarity in style, phraseology and striking ideas. Kalidasa was influenced by Asvagoșa. It cannot be definitely said about their relative priority or their being contemporaries. Many common points and parallel contexts and striking ideas from Siddhasena's works can be spotted in the poems of Asvaghosa and Kālidāsa. Dinnaga was an exponent of Vijñānavāda and the greatest Buddhist logician. There are reasons to believe that Dinnāga and Siddhasena were almost contemporaries. There are close similarities between their works: whether it is due to mutual influence or common inheritence cannot be definitely said. Some of the statements of Siddhasena in his Nyāyāvatāra are not necessarily levelled against Dinnaga but perhaps against some other school which was respected by Dinnaga. About the individuality of Sankarasvāmi there is a good deal of doubt. In case he is the author of the Nyāyapravesa, then either Siddhasena and himself have influenced each other or have inherited common legacy. Whatever may be the relative chronology of Dharmakirti and Bhamaha, we feel convinced that Siddhasena was the predecessor of these two. Dharmakīrti is assigned to the 7th century and Bhamaha was a great rhetorician. The Nyāyāvatāra of Siddhasena can be compared with the Nyāyabindu of Dharmakirti. What Siddhasena says in his Nyāyāvatāra is directed against earlier Sautrāntika and other Bauddha traditions and not against Dharmakirti and Bhamaha. The earlier exponents were Maitreya, Asanga and others. A mere similarity between the Nyāyabindu and Nyāyāvatāra cannot lead us to conclude that Siddhasena was a contemporary of Dharmakirti. In the field of Indian logic and philosophy, which is a flux of different currents, it cannot be always said who was an originator of a certain doctrine. All that can be said is that Dharmakirti and Siddhasena had a common source. The COMMENTATOR ABHAYADEVA- Abhayadeva, the pupil of Pradyumnasūri, has written a commentory, Tattvabodhavidhāyinī, Jain Education International For Personal & Private Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376