________________
304
THE INDIAN ANTIQUARY.
[OCTOBER, 1894.
201
daughters. In the list of the Nawabs of Audh it wonderful man indeed, if he was already an khould be noted that Sa'adat 'All' Khán was not author 84 years ago. Page 45, col. 2, 1. 12, why the son of Anaf-ud-Daula, but his younger here and elsewhere, Rathauri instead of Ráthaur brother, and therefore the son of Shujá -ud- or Ráthor ? Daula.
Page 118, col. 2, 1. 8, most authorities have Page 388. col. 1, line 4. The author of the Jajhár instead of Chhajjar. Page 130, col. 2, last Gulistán-i-Rahmat was Mustajab Khán, not line but one, for Aziz-ud-din read A'zz-ud-din. Mustara Khán (Elliot, VIII. 301).
Page 139, col. 2, 1. 43, for Ráughars read Rángars. Page 352, Sarbuland Khán. His appointment Page 151, col. 2, 1.38, for Lakhalus read Takhalles! as governor of Kábul is not mentioned.
Page 159, col 1, fourth line from end, for sals. Page 361, col. 2, line 9. The Hijra year 1185 read skal. Page 160, col. 2, 1. 22, for Bakhigani is wrong, it ought to be 1202 A. H., which began
read Bakhshigars. Id. fifth line from end, for 12th October, 1787, and ended 30th September,
Rekka read pakka ? Page 161, col. 2, 1.47. 1788. We know (see Jonathan Scott, II. Part
for “at that time " read “at the time," and IV. p. 293) that the 10th August, 1788 is right,
dele the comma after time. Page 164, col. 1, and we have worked out the corresponding Hijra
1. 17, for Alahwirdi read 'Aliwirdi. Page 181, date as the 9th Zü'l Ka'dh, 1202 A. H.
col. 2, 1. 45, for political read poetical. Page 186, Page 386, Siraj-ud-din Ali' Khan (Arzú). As col. 1, 1. 10 and 1. 12, for Amír read Amin. he was only born in 1101 A. H., he could hardly Page 189, col. 2, I. 2, for 1225 read 1125. have been "an officer of rank" in Farrukhsiyar's Page 200, col, L. 19, insert throne between the and reign (1124-1131). His period was later.
Raja. Page 407, Udaipuri Begam. She is generally
Page 214, col. 2, 1. 49, for Alghans read Afgháns. styled Bae Udaipurí, or Udaipurí Mahal. She died
Page 219, col. 1, 1. 36, for Bahkhá read Bhiikha. at Gwaliyár in Rabi' I., 1119 (June, 1707), a few Page 223, under Kisbn Chand cancel reference to days after the death of A'zam Shah, which took
Ikhủáy Khán. Page 258, col. 1,1. 45, for Ideaf read place on the 18th of that month (18th June, 'Imat. Page 254, col. 1, 11. 2 and 5, for Karnál 1707). One authority gives her title as Bádsháh
read Karnál. Id. 1. 8, for Kalál rend Kariwal Begam, and it may be inferred from one passage Page 270, col. 1, 11. 28 and 29, for Jalain read that she was once a dancing woman. Catrou
Jalaun, and for Mirat at Urús read Mirit-ulMays she was a Georgian from Dára Shukoh's 'Arús. Page 272, col. 1, 1. 42, for pageants we harem, and remained a Christian. The question
suggest puppets, as easier to elevate or cast down. of her origin remains a puzzle.
Page 280, col. 1, 1. 19, for 1103 read 1193. Page Page 427, Zamir. It might be noted that this 294, col. 2, 1. 45, for Singh resd Sindh. Page 310, gentleman was the father of Ghulám Husain Khán, col. 1, 11. 36 and 46, for Jaudpúr read Jodhpur, and author of the Sair-ul-Mutakharin.
for Dauroji read Damají. Page 332, col. 2, 1. 2, for Page 428, Zinat-un-nissa Begam. The year of Aosat, following the transliteration of the rest of this lady's death is put as 1122 (1710), which is, the book, read Ausat. Page 345, col. 1, 1. 51, for no doubt, justified by the date on her tomb-see
1866 read 1766. Page 319, col. 1, 1. 16, for Rukn Beale's Mifta), p. 297; Agár-18-sanádid, p. 41; read Rafi'. Page 355, col. 2, 1. 30, for was reud is, Francklin's Shah Aulum, p. 206; Thorn's War the gentleman being still alive. Id. l. 32, insert in India, p. 164. She really died eleven years -48-between Agár and Sanádid. Page 362, col. later in 1133 A. H. (22nd Rajab = 18th May, 2, 1. 8, for and read at. Page 364, col. 1, 1. 4, for 1721): but it would take too much space to set out here the evidence for this later date.
fifth line j il instead of j Page 364, col. ), We do not feel sure of having pointed out
1. 25, for Muhúru read Muhám, and the man's every error within the period covered by our remarks, nor have we attempted to supply more
name should be Şadík Husain Khan and not than a few of the omissions. We conclude with
Şádik Hasan Khán. He was a poor scholar from a a list of such misprints as we have notioed.
village near Kanauj. Page 516, col. 1, 1. 23, for Page 9, col. 1, 1. 16. For Saroána read Samána.
Lohari read Lohárú. Page 393, col. 2, 1. 26, for Id. col. 2, 1. 2-4, for Auranzib read Aurangzíb.
buried. read burned. Page 430, col. 2, 1. 42, for Id. 1. 34, for or read of. Page 35, col. 2, 1. 19,
JAJI read Jewel for Ardish rend Aráish, that is, Aráish-i-Malfil. We find that it has taken us at the outside ten Page 37, col. 1, 1. 43, for 1810 read 1840. Not days to put together these remarks. In the period many weeks ago we saw Don Pascual at the British of over ten years between Mr. Keene's first and Museum, old certainly, but still hearty, and a second editions what might not have been done ?
and at the end of the , قران we suggest قربن
