Book Title: Cultural Study of Nisitha Curni
Author(s): Madhu Sen
Publisher: Sohanlal Jain Dharm Pracharak Samiti Amrutsar

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 41
________________ POLITY AND ADMINISTRATION 21 doubtful conduct could be easily imprisoned and punished." If the first two definitions of verajja, indicating it as 'States in hostility' are accepted, it is not clear as to what was the difference between a verajja and the virud dharajja. Perhaps, the fundamental difference between the two was that, in spite of the strained relations and hostility, general trade and commerce as well as communication at the social and economic level were permitted to be continued in the verajja, whereas these were strictly restricted in the viruddharajja. 2 (v) Two-ruled States--Dorajja or dvairājya was the type of government where “sovereignty vested in the hands of two rulers, both claiming their rights to the throne, and struggling hard to appropriate the kingdom, violence being the only means to decide the issue”. 3 According to Jayaswal, in this type of government “the legal principle of joint property was transferred to the region of politics and acted upon”. * Mention of the word daiya (dayaka-a claimant)s in the NC. clearly indicates that such kingdoms came into existence when there were two or more claimants to the throne, neither of whom was inclined to leave his right. Very often it would lead to conflict and disharmony. Kautilya characterises dvairājya or 'the rule of two' as "a constitution of rivalry and mutual conflict leading to final destruction.'» The author of the NC. also does not recommend the constitution of dvairājya." (vi ) Republics---Gañarajja in ancient India denoted a form of government where the power vested not in the 1. Ibid. 2. See p. 20, note 8; also Brh. V. 3, p. 781. 3. OTTICHTET TIZI FUT FTTHÍ TETTE Å TEE HOU-NC. 3, p. 198; also Brl. V?. 3, p. 780. 4. Jayaswal, op. cit., p. 86. 5. See above Note 3. 6. राज्यवैराज्ययोः द्वै राज्यमन्योन्यपक्षद्वषानुरागाभ्यां परस्परसंघर्षेग वा विनश्यति । --Arthašāstra, VIII. 1-2. 7. NC. 3, p. 198. The nature of dvairājya mentioned by Kālidāsa is quite different from that of the NC. The dvairājya mentioned in the Malavikāgnimitra does not refer to a joint rule and responsibility, Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 ... 432