Book Title: Reals on the Jaina Metaphysics
Author(s): Harisatya Bhattacharya
Publisher: Shatnidas Khetsy Charitable Trust Mumbai

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 18
________________ Introduction phenomena. It refers to two primordial Realities and explains the experiential reals by placing them as series or modes in the various stages of an uninterrupted evolution from the aforesaid fundamental Duality. Equally emphatic is the Sāmkhya-yoga in its description of man being in a 'sad' state of limitations and in its insistence on the state of liberation. THE VEDĀNTA AND THE BUDDHIST SYSTEMS Among the thinkers of the Vedānta school, there are some who admit the reality of man and the universe outside him. Similarly there are Buddhistic schools who do not deny the reality of man and the outside world. The speculations of these Vedāntic and Buddhist thinkers are obviously as good philosophies as materialism or the Sāṁkhyayoga dualism or the Nyāya-raiseșika pluralism. The Kevalādvaita or pure monism of the school of Sankara and the Sünyavada or absolute nihilism of the Buddhist Mādhyamika school deny the reality of our experiential reals, both psychical and non-psychical; but these are not the less philosophical systems on that account. Nay, they too are philosophies, complete in themselves. It may be said that both the Buddhist nihilists and the Vedāntic monists begin by admitting the tentative reality of the objects of our experience and while explaining and laying bare their essential nature in the philosophic manner, the former proves that nothing is real, while the latter establishes that besides the One and the Secondless existence, absolute and abstract, there is no other real. The position of the nihilist may be right or wrong, and so of the monist. But surely theirs may be two ways of explaining the experiential series and rigorous logic has always been brought to their support. We know, there are modern critics who contend that by denying the reality of our experiential reals, the Kevalādvaita and the Sünyavada shirk, as it were, their responsibility and duty for explaining them and as such they cannot be called systems of philosophy at all. This criticism is hardly fair. A phantom, for instance, is nothing after all and if one's Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 ... 430