Book Title: Reality English Translation of Sarvarthasiddhi
Author(s): S A Jain
Publisher: Jwalamalini Trust Chennai

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 189
________________ PERMANENCE AND NON-PERMANENCE 157 tence, condition or mode. A thing is seen as having the same nature with which it was seen formerly. So it is recognized in the form, This is the same as that'. If it be considered that the old thing has completely disappeared and that an entirely new thing is come into existence, then there can be no remembrance. And worldly relations based on it would be disturbed. Therefore, the indestructibility of the essential nature of a substance is determined as permanence. But it should be taken from one point of view. If it be permanent from all points of view, then there can be no change at all. And, in that case, transmigration as well as the way to salvation would become meaningless 2 A contention arises. It is a contradiction to say that a thing is permanent and it is not permanent. If it were permanent alone, there can be no destruction and origination, and impermanence would be negatived. If it were transient alone, there can be no continuance and hence no permanence. But there is no contradiction in that. अर्पितानर्पितसिद्धः Il 32 11 Arpitānarpitasiddheḥ (32) 32. (The contradictory characteristics are established) from different points of vie, Substances are characterized by an infinite number of attributes. For the sake of use or need, prominence is given to certain characteristics of a substance from one point of view. And prominence is not given to other characteristics, as these are of no use or need at the time. Thus even the existing attributes are not expressed, as these are of secondary importance (anarpita). There is no contradiction in what is established by these two points of view. For instance, there is no contradiction in the same person Devadatta being a father, a son, a brother, a nephew and so on. For the points of viow are different. From the point of view of his son he is 1 i. e. the indestructibility of the past nature in the present. 2 If the soul were permanent (unchangeable) utterly, then transmigration of the soul as a man, a hell-being and so on and liberation, the end of transmigration, would both be impossible. Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334