Book Title: Outlines of Indian Philosophy
Author(s): M Hiriyanna
Publisher: George Allen and Unwin Ltd

Previous | Next

Page 233
________________ NYAYA-VAISEȘIKA 233 teristic of reality. In this it differs from some other doctrines, e.g. the Sankhya, which has no conception of static objects at all in the physical world. Infinite dravyas are always stable, for the doctrine recognizes only change of place (parispanda), but not change of form (pariņāma); atomic and finite dravyas may or may not be moving. Samanya ('Universal'). -The manifold entities, so far alluded to, are reducible to types. There is order in them which is due to objective features and is not imported into them by the perceiving mind. It is by virtue of this order that objects are divisible not only into the three classes of dravya, guna and karma, but also into sub-classes like cows, redness or flying. It is necessary to caution the student against taking sămânya as the equivalent of 'genus.' It stands for merely a feature or property common to two or more things, and not like genus for a class of things.exhibiting such a feature. The category dravya includes jars, cloths, etc., but the sămânya of dravyatva which characterizes every dravya does not include the lower sämānyas of 'jar-ness' (ghatatva), 'cloth-ness' (pațatva), etc. The term samanya may be better rendered by the word 'universal,' without, however, suggesting a complete resemblance to the Platonic 'idea.': It is in all and in each; and yet it is not different in different particulars. Thus cow-ness is one and unanalysable. It always subsists, but it can be apprehended not by itself but only through a particular cow. Though appearing together, cow and cow-ness are conceived as two distinct entities. Of these universals, sattā or Being is the highest, for it is found to characterize the largest number of entities; and the others follow it in a descending order, like dravyatva, prthivitva and ghațatva; gunatva and Suklatva.; and so forth, each characterizing less and less numerous things. We find the keenest controversy raging round this conception. Some, like the Jains, admit a basis for it in the For instance, the particulars are not here viewed as copies of the universal * We are here taking into consideration only the more important variety of sămânya known as jāti. There is also recognized another variety called upādhi, e.g. 'cap-wearing,' which may be common to several students. The description given above does not apply to it.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419