Book Title: Outlines of Indian Philosophy
Author(s): M Hiriyanna
Publisher: George Allen and Unwin Ltd

Previous | Next

Page 253
________________ NYAYA-VAISEȘIKA 253 in which it is not so, as in the stock example of shell-silver (sukti-rajata). Here also the doctrine maintains that not only the subject but also the predicative element is presented, but the presentation is of the alaukika kind-the second variety of it, where the impression of a former experience serves as the means of re-presenting a thing to our mind. The silver is not here, but elsewhere. It is āpaņastha ('in the shop'), as it is stated. Thus in such cases also, error is due to a wrong synthesis of presented objects only. The argument may appear specious, but all that is meant is that even the content of error has a complete objective basis, and what does not exist at all (asat) can never be known. What serves as the subject of an erroneous judgment ('this') is actually given; the predicate also is, though elsewhere and not here. This theory, which is directly opposed to the Madhyamika view that the non-existent is perceived (asatkhyāti), is known as anyatha-khyāti, a term which indicates that the discrepancy found in error is in regard to the predicative element. It may be asked how the correspondence with reality, which is said to constitute truth, can be known. There can obviously be no direct testing of correspondence, for we cannot get outside of our knowledge. Hence the NyāyaVaišesika proposes an objective or indirect test-through putting the knowledge in question to practice. If we doubt whether a thing we cognize as water is really water or not, we have to see whether it will quench our thirst. The proof of the pudding is in the eating of it. This is what is known as samvādi-pravrtti or 'fruitful activity.' The verification is pragmatic; but the definition of truth, it should be remembered, is not so. Truth is not what 'works'; it is what conforms to reality. Knowledge is for its own sake, and it need not necessarily have a practical end in view. Unlike the Buddhists (p. 209), the followers of the Nyāya-Vaišeşika lay stress on the cognitive significance of knowledge. The practical activity to which it leads is only a further result. It Anyathā implies prakära. Cf. Sarvam jñānam dharminyabhrāntam, prakāre tu viparyayah: Sapta-padārthi (Vizianagaram Sans. Series), P. 25. · NM. Pp. 160-1.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419