Book Title: Outlines of Indian Philosophy
Author(s): M Hiriyanna
Publisher: George Allen and Unwin Ltd

Previous | Next

Page 325
________________ PURVA-MIMAMSA 325 'light,' is not thought of wherever darkness is seen is equally unconvincing. Of these dravyas, the first four as well as darkness are stated to be of atomic structure and the remaining ones, including soul, are described as infinite and ultimate. By 'atom' in this system should not be understood the infinitesimal paramāņu of the Vaiśeşika, but the smallest particle which experience acquaints us with, viz. the mote in the sunbeam which corresponds to the tryanuka of the other doctrine. The Vaiśeşika conception of atom is described as purely speculative, but it does not seem to be altogether rejected.1 From all the atomic substances, objects of different magnitudes may, as in the Nyaya-Vaiśeşika, be derived; only the relation between the material cause and the effect is here viewed as bhedabheda or tādātmya ('identity in difference'), instead of samavaya (p. 239), in accordance with the Bhāṭṭa belief in sat-karya-vada. These dravyas form only the support, as it were, of the universe. There are also other features of it which are divisible into three classesguna, karma and samanya or jāti, which together with dravya form the four positive categories of Kumārila's system. But it must be remembered that they are not conceived as entirely distinct from the dravyas to which they belong. The relation between them is one of identity in difference, so that the significance of 'category' here is not the same as in the Nyaya-Vaiseṣika. Kumārila's list also includes negation (abhava), and we therefore have five categories in all.3 The first of them has already been described and it is sufficient for our purpose to state that the notion of the others is for the most part like that in the NyāyaVaisesika. The Prabhakaras accept four more positive categories of which we need refer here only to one, viz. samavāya. Its recognition means the entire rejection of the relation of identity in difference (bhedabheda) admitted by the Bhāṭṭas.4 As a consequence substance and attribute, universal and particular, material cause and effect come to be conceived as altogether distinct, and the doctrine does not subscribe to Mana-meyodaya, p. 6. 4 PP. p. 27. 1 SV. p. 404, st. 183-4. 3 Id. p. 65.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419