Book Title: Outlines of Indian Philosophy
Author(s): M Hiriyanna
Publisher: George Allen and Unwin Ltd

Previous | Next

Page 327
________________ PORVA-MIMANSA 327 to reduce its value in the eyes of man. It does nothing of the kind. For, as conceived in the Mimāmsă, ceremonial life does not exclude common morality; it is, on the other hand, founded in it. 'The Vedas cleanse not the unrighteous.' Though not viewed as the highest, ethical purity is regarded as a pre-condition as well as a necessary accompaniment of religious or spiritual life. The few occasions on which the dictates of common morality seem to be neglected, as for example in the immolation of an animal in a rite, are explained as only the exceptions that prove the rule. However unconvincing the explanation given in justification of these acts, it should be admitted that generally the Veda supports conclusions that are ethically quite unexceptionable. In the present case, for instance, it explicitly forbids injury to living beings: Na himsyāt sarvā bhūtāni. When dharma is understood in this unique sense, it naturally requires an equally unique pramāna to make it known (p. 109). That pramāņa is the Veda.. While the standard of judgment for common morality is human, that for dharma is superhuman. "We should distinguish, Kumārila says, 'between what relates to dharma and mokṣa which is known from the Veda and what relates to artha and kāma which is learnt by worldly intercourse.'3 It is not merely common human experience that is of no avail in knowing dhatma and adharma, but also the higher faculty of yogic perception recognized for the purpose in doctrines like the NyāyaVaisesika (p. 262). The single name of apūrvat (literally meaning 'never before') which Prabhākara gives to dharma and adharma emphasizes their inaccessibility to the other pramāņas (mānäntarāpūrva). It is conceived by him as the result of sacrificial and such other acts-not those acts themselves as in the Nyāya-Vaiseşika---and corresponds to the punya and pāpa of the other doctrine. But it abides like the latter in the self (ātma-samavāyi), so that apūrva is a subjective feature to be distinguished from the objective act leading to it. According to Kumarila these forms of activity Acāra-hinam na punanti Vedāḥ: Quoted by Sarkara in his com. on VS. iii. i. 1o. · Jaimini-sútra, I. i. 2. 3 Tantra-vārtika, I. iii. 2. 4 See PP. PP. 187, 195.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419