Book Title: Outlines of Indian Philosophy
Author(s): M Hiriyanna
Publisher: George Allen and Unwin Ltd

Previous | Next

Page 270
________________ 270 OUTLINES OF INDIAN PHILOSOPHY recognized text-book. It has been assigned to about the end of the fifth century A.D.; and if this date be correct, the traditional identification of its author with Patañjali, the grammarian who is known to have lived in the second century B.C., must fall to the ground. It consists of four chapters which deal respectively with the nature of mental concentration (samadhi), the pathway to it (sādhana), the supernatural powers that may be acquired through it (vibhūti), and the nature of the goal of life which consists in the isolation of the self (kaivalya). It has been commented upon by Vyāsa2 (A.D. 500) and King Bhoja (A.D. 1000) among others. The former's commentary has a splendid gloss by Vācaspati and another by Vijñāna Bhikṣu. The Sankhya-Yoga like the Nyāya-Vaiseșika admits a: 3, called purusas, and is likewise realistic since it regards objects as existing independently of the mind that cognizes them. But while the latter traces the physical universe to a multiplicity of sources, the former derives it from a single one, viz. prakrti. In other words, the SankhyaYoga, unlike the Nyāya-Vaišeşika, is-if we overlook for the moment the plurality of selves-dualistic, prakrti and puruşa or nature and spirit being the only two ultimate entities recognized. We shall now consider in some detail how each of these is conceived : (I) Prakrti. This is the first cause of the universe-of everything excepting only spirit which is uncaused, and accounts for whatever is physical, both matter and force. Out of it, the whole variety of the universe evolves. Hence the doctrine is known as parināma-vāda or a Even space and time are represented as aspects of praksti and do not, therefore, exist apart from its as independent entities. This is a point which is worthy of note, for it shows that the system does not, like the generality of philosophic Prof. Jacobi: Dates of Philosophical Sütras, JAOS. (1911). 1 It is difficult to say who this Vyasa was. Tradition identifies him with the well-known author of that name. 3 STK. st. 33: SPB. ii. 12.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419