Book Title: Gandharavada
Author(s): Esther A Solomon
Publisher: Gujarat Vidyasabha

Previous | Next

Page 191
________________ 102 that body, etc. originate without a cause, just by chance. But this is not consistent for whatever originates without a cause or by chance has no particular shape, e. g. transformations of clouds, etc.. Body, etc. have a beginning and a particular shape; hence their origination cannot be just accidental, but must be brought about by karma. It follows that body, etc. having a particular shape have been created by a creator with his full causal apparatus. In the condition when it is in the womb, the jiva has no causal complement other than karma. Hence all the manifoldness and variety in the world is not there just by chance, but is due to karma. If svabhava is conceived as the attribute of a thing even then if it be an attribute of the soul as consciousness is, it could not be the cause of the body, etc. as it would be incorporeal. If it be regarded as an attribute of a corporeal thing, this would be equivalent to accepting what was intended to be established, as karma too is accepted by Mahavira as a particular mode of matter (pudgalastikaya-paryaya-viseṣa). There is a Vedic statement: puruşa eveḍam sarvam yad bhutam yac ca bhavyam, utamṛtatvasyeśāno yad annenätirohati; yad ejati yad naijati yad dūre yad u antike yad antar asya sarvasya yat sarvasyasya bahyatah. (See Gathā 1580). This is interpreted by Agnibhuti to mean that the purusa (soul) alone exists. ['Eva' is taken to negate the existence of karma, prakṛti (matter), God, etc.]. Whatever is past (i. e. samsara from the point of view of the emancipated) and what is future (i. e. emancipation from the point of view of the bound samsarin), he who is the lord of immortality (emancipation), who grows by food, what moves (animals, etc.) and what does not (mountains, etc.), what is far (Meru, etc.) and also what is near and what is within the sentient and the insentient and what is without these, all this is purusa alone. Agnibhuti thus believes that according to the Veda, the existence of nothing other than the puruşa in admitted, which means that the existence of karma, etc. is negated. Moreover it has been said in the Veda Vijnanaghana evaitebhyaḥ bhütebhyaḥ........' (see Gathā 1553); here also, in the view of Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400