Book Title: Gandharavada
Author(s): Esther A Solomon
Publisher: Gujarat Vidyasabha

Previous | Next

Page 263
________________ 174 must be existent. Akampita should not obstinately urge that his pratyakṣa, direct perception alone is pratyakṣa; the pratyakṣa of others also is pratyakṣa. We find in the world that the pratyaksa of reliable persons is given as much importance and validity as one's own pratyaksa. All do not have the direct knowledge of lion, sarabha, hamsa (swan) and yet no one regards them as not known or uncognised or uncognisable. Akampita himself has not seen all places, times, villages, towns, rivers, oceans and yet he recognises them as existent and cognisable, and he also recognises the pratyakṣa of others as pratyakṣa. Therefore, if narakas are, directly cognised by Mahāvīra, they should be recognised as directly knowable (1888-91). * Moreover, is it true to say that sensuous perception is the only perception and that Mahavira's perception being supersensuous cannot be accepted as such? In fact it is only by courtesy that sensuous perception is called perception. It is supersensuous perception that is the only true perception as it does not depend on extraneous help and pertains to the soul alone. Sensuous perception is really indirect, but it is called direct perception only figuratively inasmuch as it does not have to depend on the knowledge of an extraneous object, as inferential knowledge of fire depends on the knowledge of an extraneous mark, viz. smoke. But sensuous perception too is, as a matter of fact, not direct, because as in inference we do not have the cognition of fire directly but through smoke, so here also the akṣa (perceiver) i. e. atman does not have the knowledge of a thing directly but through sense-organs which are other than the soul. Hence what is called direct perception is really as much indirect as inference. Super-sensuous perception is the only real perception. Hence the narakas must be recognised as perceptible on the basis of Lord Mahavira's pratyakṣa (1892). It should not be argued that even though in sensuous perception the soul does not know the object directly, yet the *A mythological creature supposed to have eight legs and to inhabit snowy tracts. Sarabha also means camel, young one of an elephant, butterfly, locust, etc. Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400