Book Title: Gandharavada
Author(s): Esther A Solomon
Publisher: Gujarat Vidyasabha

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 220
________________ 131 Again, is the Nihilist identical or not with the conception, ‘All the three worlds are void' and the expression of it ? If he is identical, then Nihilism stands refuted for identity is an existent fact as in the case of 'treeness' and 'simšapāness'. If he is not identical, then the Nihilist is devoid of knowledge and speech, and under these circumstances how could he possibly prove Nihilism; a heap of stones cannot argue out á case ? (1721). Vyakta had argued that if jar and existence were identical, everything would be of the nature of jar; or as the contradictory non-jar would be non-existent, jar itself would cease to exist.* Mahāvīra's rejoinder is that 'existence of the jar' is an attribute of the jar and identical with it, but it is certainly different from all the other things, cloth, etc.. Hence when it is said that the jar exists it does not necessarily mean that the jar alone exists, for everything does have its own existence. Thus this reasoning of Vyakta or of any Nihilist has no force. This also shows that the existence of jar will not serve as an obstruction to the existence of other things for each thing has an independent existence of its own (1722–3). The sum and substance of the argument is that 'existence of jar' is an attribute of the jar alone, and is different from cloth, etc., is not found in them. When we talk of existence in general terms it may be referred to jar or non-jar. But when it is specifically said, 'Jar exists' it can refer to the jar alone. This can be clarified by giving an example: 'Tree' refers to mango and non-mango trees; but 'mango-tree' necessarily means a tree and not a non-tree for the latter can never be a mango-tree (1724). Vyakta had said that neither the produced nor the nonproduced, nor the produced-non-produced, nor the being produced can be produced. Such a thinker may be asked what is that thing which he regards as produced ? If this something is admitted by him then Nihilism falls to the ground and all * See Gāthà 1693 and its commentary. Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400