Book Title: Anusandhan 2001 00 SrNo 18
Author(s): Shilchandrasuri
Publisher: Kalikal Sarvagya Shri Hemchandracharya Navam Janmashatabdi Smruti Sanskar Shikshannidhi Ahmedabad

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 33
________________ 26 Foot-notes: 1. Āyāramga-Sutta, Part I, Preface, pp. viji-xiv, London, 1882. 2. Ācārānga-Sūtra, Erster Śruta-skandha, Leipzig, 1910. 3. Ibid No.1. 4. See Kalpasūtra, (Preface pp. 3-7), Sārābhāi Manilāl Nawāb, Ahmedebad, 1952; Prof. Ludwig Alsdorf also agreed with the former and admitted that there was imperative need to reconsider the whole problem seriously. 5. Ibid No. 1. p. viii. 6. Pischel's Comparative Grammar of Prakrits, Para 18. 7. See Ibid foot-note No. 4 and the editions of Amg. Canonical Texts by Prof. W. Schubring, etc. 8. In the text of Acārānga edited by Jacobi, there are numerous usages retaining medial consonants and they are just like Pāli language. Pischel (para No. 18) rejects the idea of inclusion of Amg. under Mahārāșțrī and would like to connect it with Māgadhi Inscriptions. He further says, it is likely that at the time of compilation of the canon at the councils of Mathurā and Valabhi, the original dialect got a western colouring. At Valabhī particularly the influence of Mahārāștrī might have been quite considerable. But such an influence could not have been significant because even by it the basic character of Amg. was not touched. 9. Medial = and Y = & in some usages is not due to the influence of Sauraseni as scholars believe, but this kind of voicing the unvoiced medial consonants seems to have begun before Christian era and later on this trait became the main feature of Sauraseni. 10. Initial dental nasal I - is retained by Indian editors of Amg. texts, but in some cases it is cerebralised into UI - which is definitely a wrong practice as far as Amg. is concerned. 11. T and are changed to in Ashokan inscriptions of the East, and therefore the same rule for Amg. and their change into ouL in it is to be regarded as a wrong practice. 12. The -ņi (ToT) suffix of neuter Nom. and Acc. plural is archaic which is replaced by -im (-3) in the later Prakrits. As far as the archaic nature of Amg. is concerned -ni (1) should be used in place of -ņi (for) in the light of Pāli and Ashokan inscriptions. 13. Comparative Grammar of the Prakrit Languages. Dr. K. R. CHANDRA 375, SARASWATI NAGAR NR. HIMMATLAL PARK AMBAWADI AHMEDABAD 380015 Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292