Book Title: Lord Mahavira and His Times
Author(s): Kailashchandra Jain
Publisher: Motilal Banarasidas

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 177
________________ Lord Mahavira's Religious Contemporaries and Sects THE DOCTRINE OF THE SIX CLASSES OF BEINGS (CHHALABHIJĀTIYO) 157 In a passage of the Anguttara-nikaya, Ananda expounds to Pūraṇa Kassapa Makkhali Gośāla's doctrine of the six classes of human beings (Chhalabhijātiyo), such as Kanhābhijāti (black class of being), nīlābhijāti (blue class of being) etc. A.L. BASHAM2 has tried to prove that Pūraṇa, a heretical leader of long standing who maintained a fatalistic doctrine with tendencies to antinomianism, came in contact with Makkhali Gośāla, a younger teacher with doctrines much the same as his own, but with a more successful appeal to the public. Recognizing his eclipse, he admitted the superiority of the new teacher, and accepted the sixfold classification of men, which placed Makkhali Gośāla and his forerunners, Nanda Vachcha, and Kisa Sankichcha, in the highest category. PAKUDHA KACHCHAYANA (KAKUDA KĀTYĀYANA) Pakudha Kachchāyana was an elder contemporary of the Buddha. He was a leader of some religious body and was held in great esteem by the people of the time. Buddhaghosha says that Pakudha is his personal name and Kachchayana his family (gotra) name. The term 'Pakudha' has been traditionally interpreted as prakrudha, furious. Its alternative form is Kakudha or Kakuddha which means the same thing. Assuming 'Kakuda' to be the original and correct form meaning 'a man having a hump on his back, B.M. BARUA connects this Katyayana with Kabandhi Katyayana, one of the pupils of the sage Pippalada of the Praina Upanishad. The suggestion, though ingenious, lacks a convincing proof. As Pakudha Kachchayana has left us no records of his own, we have to depend for a knowledge of his doctrine on the Prasnopanishad, the Sāmañña-phala-sutta, and the Sutrakṛitanga. In the Praśnopanishad, in answer to Katyāyana's question to Pippalada as to the roots of things, he was told that the roots were Matter (Rayi) and Spirit (Prāṇa). Buddhaghosha records 1. digu, III, pp. 353-St. 2. History and Doctrines of the Ajivikas, p. 90. 3. Burir, p. 227.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427