Book Title: Lord Mahavira and His Times
Author(s): Kailashchandra Jain
Publisher: Motilal Banarasidas

Previous | Next

Page 231
________________ Political Conditions and Institutions a Minister named Pulika (Puņika) is said to have killed his master and appointed his own son, Pradyota, the ruler in the very sight of the Kshatriyas.1 Pradyota was thus Puņika's son, and with him commenced the Pradyota dynasty. Pradyota was one of the most powerful monarchs of North India in the days of Lord Mahāvīra, and during that period Avanti rose to a high position. It was no less than Magadha in strength and position. According to the Buddhist text Mahavagga,2 Pradyota was a great soldier; and, according to the Puranas, he reduced many of his contemporary rulers to subjection. The Purānas do not give us a detailed list, but those subjugated may have been among the rulers of ShoḍaśaMahajanapadas. 211 The relations of Pradyota with Bimbisāra of Magadha were cordial. Bimbisara sent his famous physician Jivaka to cure Pradyota when he fell ill. On the other hand, the Jaina legends mention that Pradyota went forth to attack Rājagriha, even during the lifetime of Bimbisāra, but the attempt was foiled by the cunning prince Abhaya. It is however definite that Pradyota's relations with Bimbisara's son, Ajātaśatru became strained. Ajätaśatru adopted an aggressive policy of attacking and conquering Vaisali. Being an ambitious ruler himself, Pradyota could not tolerate the aggression launched upon him by Ajataśatru. Both of them wanted to establish their supremacy in northern India. Pradyota was planning an attack upon his rival's capital at Rajagṛiha. Apprehending this invasion by Pradyota, Ajātaśatru fortified his capital. Pradyota wanted to consolidate and extend his kingdom. In his neighbourhood, there was the powerful kingdom of Kausambi ruled by his rival Udayana Vatsarāja of the celebrated Bharata family. Pradyota seems to have engaged in war with Udayana but later on amity between them was 1. Matsya, p. 272, I, V. 37. 303. 2. SBE, XVII, p. 187. 3. ABORI, 1920-21; DPPN, I, 128. 4 CHI, I, p. 311. 5. RBI, pp. 4-7.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427