Book Title: Lord Mahavira and His Times
Author(s): Kailashchandra Jain
Publisher: Motilal Banarasidas

Previous | Next

Page 175
________________ Lord Mahavira's Religious Contemporaries and Sects presumed that he might have lived in the sixth century B.C. as is evident from references to him as a contemporary of king Ajātaśatru of Magadha. He was the head of a religious order and the founder of a school (tittha-karo). He was followed by a large body of disciples and honoured throughout the country. It seems from his name that he was born in a Brāhmaṇa family. The name Pūraṇa (Pūrṇa) indicates that he was believed to have been fully enlightened and perfect in wisdom. NO-ACTION THEORY (AKRIYĀVĀDA) Pūraṇa Kassapa is known to be the exponent of the 'noaction' theory (Akriyāvāda). It is said that Ajātaśatru once visited Purana Kassapa, who expounded his views thus: "To him who acts or causes another to act, mutilates or causes another to mutilate, punishes, or causes another to punish, causes grief or torment, trembles or causes another to tremble, kills other creatures, takes what is not given, breaks into houses, commits dacoity or robbery or tells lies, to him, thus acting, there is no guilt.... no increase of guilt would ensure.... In giving alms, in offering sacrifices, in self mastery, in control of senses, and in speaking truth, there is neither merit nor increase of merit." 331 This is called an exposition of the 'no-action' theory (Akriyavada). According to it, man is an irresponsible agent, because his action brings neither any merit nor any demerit. In other words, this doctrine was amoral because one might do whatever one wanted to do without becoming sinful or virtuous. 155 The Sutrakṛitanga furnishes a parallel passage where the doctrine is expressly called Akriyavada. Śilanka calls it Akārakavada and implicitly identifies it with the Sänkhya view. The identity between the view of Puraṇa Kassapa and this Akūrakavada is probable, not certain. THE DOCTRINE OF THE PASSIVITY OF THE SOUL Most probably, Kassapa was, as B.M. BARUA states, an advocate of the theory that the Soul was passive (nishkripa). that no action could affect it, and that it was beyond good and 1. RBI. pp. 69-70. 2. Sutra, I. 1. 1. 13. 3. Burir. p. 279.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427