Book Title: Lord Mahavira and His Times
Author(s): Kailashchandra Jain
Publisher: Motilal Banarasidas

Previous | Next

Page 179
________________ Lord Mahāvīra's. Religious Contemporaries and Sects 159 rines of Pakudha. It is also somewhat different because the existence of Ākāśa (ether or space) is distinctly recognised, and it omits sukha and dukha. Śğlāöka identifies the doctrine of soul as a sixth category with the doctrine of the Bhagavad Gita, as well as with the Sankhya and some of the Saiva systems. There is no doubt about some sort of historical relationship existing between them. VIEWS ABOUT ACTION AND THE SOUL Like Kassapa, Kachchāyana denied not the appearance, but the reality of action and also asserted that the soul was really untouched by change and was therefore superior to good and evil. It is perhaps not too much to imagine that this doctrine was formulated in opposition to the doctrine of Samsāra according to which the soul suffered and was itself responsible for its sufferings. Gośāla accepted the process of Saṁsāra but gave of it a new explanation. Being apparently Brāhmanas, Kassapa and Kachchāyana were probably acquainted with the Upanishadic speculation and were still more radical in their denial of the real existence of the problem itself. THEORIES OF ETERNALISM AND NON-ACTION The fragment of the Satra-kṣitāiga clearly shows that Kachchāyana adopted the Gotamaka or Eleatic postulatc of being that nothing comes out of nothing.? It appears from the fragments of both the Satraksilānga and the Samañña-phala-sulta that the term Eternalismo was strictly applied by Mahavira and Buddha to the doctrine of Kachchāyana. It also comes under the definition of what Mahāvīra calls Pluralism (Anikka vāda).3 Mahāvīra and Buddha considered Kachchāyana's doctrinc to be a doctrine of non-action (akrijā-žādn). If the clements are ctcrnally existent and unchangeable by their very nature, if clicy incchanically unite or separate by Picasure and Pain inlicrcnt in cach of tlıcm, if there is no volitional activity or consciousness, there is no ground for the conception of or dir 1. 2. 3. Salra, 11-2. Standinga, IV; Digha, 1.13-17. Ibid. IV. 4.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427