Book Title: Lord Mahavira and His Times
Author(s): Kailashchandra Jain
Publisher: Motilal Banarasidas

Previous | Next

Page 181
________________ Lord Mahavira's Religious Contemporaries and Sects 161 NEGATIVE AND POSITIVE ASPECTS Ajita was antinomian in ethics. It is remarkable that his categorical assertions are all negative in form. According to him, there is no merit in sacrifice or offering, no resultant fruit from good and evil deeds. No one passes from this world to the next. No benefit results from the service rendered to mother and father. There is no afterlifc. There are no ascetics or Brāhmaṇas who have attained perfection by following the right path, and who, as a result of knowledge, have experienced this world as well as the next and can proclaim the same. There is no existence of individuality after death. The four elements of existence constitute a living body. When a man dies, carth returns to earth, water to water, heat to fire, air to air, and the sense faculties pass into space. It is a doctrinc of fools, this talk of existence after death, for all alike, the foolish and the wise are cut off, annihilated, and ceasc to be after death.1 Ajita in the negative aspect of his doctrine resembles Epicurus, while on the positive side of his speculations lic seems to be more a Stoic than an Epicurcan, his fundamental point being that nothing but the corporcal is real." DOCTRINE OF TAM-JĪVA-TAN-SARĪRA-VĀDA Ajita's doctrine was described by Mahāvíra and Buddha as Tari-jiva-tari-sarira-vāda, in contradistinction to the doctrine of the soul being distinct from the body (Aññanijiva-aññai-sarīra-vāda). Ajita was not so much against the dogmas of the Bralımanic faith as against thc doctrine of Kachchīyana and others who made a hard and fast distinction between the body and the soul, beteen matier and spirit, in sliori, who conceived the soul as an entity cxisting independently of anything corporeal or material. Thus in one sense like a Stoic, hic identified the crorju.scal with the menial, and in another sense he did not. His in srition was not to identify the body with the soul, j d soon. cepts, for what lie sought to establish was ina! t?r real hier experience is always a living wins, a whole whir! :17;é1. Dic!, B, 11. 73-74. :. Rutir, p. 2?!,

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427