Book Title: Jaina Philosophy
Author(s): Mohanlal Mehta
Publisher: Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan

Previous | Next

Page 182
________________ JUDGMENT one, many, identical, different and the like. It possesses infinite attributes. These attributes or characteristics (dharmas) are not conceptual but they really exist in the object. The term 'anekānta' indicates the ontological nature of reality, according to which every object possesses infinite aspects. When we speak of a particular aspect, we have to use the word 'syāt', i.e., from a particular point of view or as related to this aspect, this object is such and not otherwise. As for instance, when we speak of the aspect of existence of a pot, we choose the 'existence' aspect of that pot which possesses many other aspects as well. We make a statement about the aspect of existence, i.e., in relation to the aspect of existence, the pot exists. Take another example: Mohan is a father, brother, uncle etc. according to various relations. He is the father of his son, the brother of his brother and so on. When his son calls him, he uses the word 'father.' Now, Mohan possesses many aspects like those of father, brother etc. In relation to his son, he is father. Thus, Mohan is a father as related to his son, i.e., relatively Mohan is a father. Hence, 'Syādvāda', i.e., the theory of the relativity of propositions is the theory of the relativity of judgment. When an object, which is anekäntätmaka (possessing many characteristics), is expressed in a particular form of judgment, the expression is known as Syādvāda. We can express the characteristics of an object from different points of view and these points of view are expressed by the word 'syat'. As it is said: 'The judgment about an object possessing many characteristics is called 'Syadvāda'.' The theory of 'Syādvāda' is also called 'Anekāntavāda,' because the relativity of judgment is nothing but a relative judgment about an object that possesses infinite aspects or qualities. In other words, the relative judgment is not possible unless the object for which that judgment stands is anekāntātmaka. Hence, the judgment that stands for an object Laghiyastraya-ṭīkā, 1. Anekāntātmakärthakathanam syādvādaḥ 62. Jain Education International 169 For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328