Book Title: Epigraphia Indica Vol 26
Author(s): Hirananda Shastri
Publisher: Archaeological Survey of India

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 227
________________ 178 EPIGRAPHIA INDICA. (VOL. XXVI. and n have closely similar forms; b, as distinguished from v, is indicated in one place by a rectangular sign almost identical with that for p, see babhüva, 1. 2; in all other cases, it is denoted by the sign for v. The sign of the avagraha occurs twice in l. 4. The language is Sanskrit and the record is, on the whole, correctly written. It evinces here and there the poet's fondness for alliteration. Except for the customary obeisance to Siva in the beginning and the usual imprecation, the partioulars of the date and the name of the writer at the end, the inscription is metrically composed throughout. It contains fourteen verses, all of which áre numbered. The orthography shows the usual peculiarities of the reduplication of a consonant following r and the use of v for b. The inscription belongs to the reign of the Paramāra prince Jagaddāva. The object of it is to record that Jagaddēva granted the village Dongaragrāma to the Brahmana Srinivāsa and that the latter erected there a temple which he dedicated to Siva for the religious merit of his father Srinidhi. The inscription was written by Visvasvamin. The date is given in the last line as the full-moon tithi of Chaitra in the Saka year 1034 (expressed in decimal figures only), the cyclic year being Nandana. This date corresponds to Friday, the 15th March A. D. 1112. It does not admit of verification, but it may be noted that the cyclic year corresponding to the expired Saka year 1034 was Nandana according to the southern lunisolar system. This is the only dated record of the reign of Jagaddēva and the only Paramāra inscription found in Berar. Another inscription of Jagaddēva's reign was discovered some years ago at Jainad in the Adilābād District of the Nizam's Dominions, but it is undated. By way of introduction the inscription gives the genealogy of the king Jagaddēva. Like other Paramāra records it mentions that the royal family was descended from the eponymous hero Paramāra who was born from the sacrificial fire of Vasishtha when the latter was enraged by Visvāmitra forcibly seizing his kāmadhënu. In his family which by its noble warlike deeds gurpassed the solar and lunar races, was born Bhöja who resembled Rāma by his noble qualities. We are next told that when the Mālava country sank under the attacks of three enemies, Udayāditya, the brother (bhrātā) of Bhoja, came to its rescue. This is the first record in which the relationship of Udayāditya to Bhoja is so clearly stated. Some Paramära inscriptions describe Udayāditya as meditating on the feet of Bhöja, but they do not mention how he was related to Bhöja. The Nagpur Museum stone inscription dated Vikrama Samvet 1161 has indeed been known for a long time to refer to Udayaditya as a bandhu of Bhöja, but as bandhu signifies in Sanskrit the sense of a distant relative as well as that of a brother, Udayaditya was supposed by scholars to be remotely related to Bhöja. The aforementioned Jainad inscription mentions Bhoja as the pitfivya (uncle) and Udayāditya as the father of Jagaddēva. This clearly implies that Udayāditya was a brother of Bhöja, but as a stone inscription at Udayapur gives an altogether different genealogy for Udyāditya from that of Bhoja, namely, that he was the son of Gyātā, grandson of Göndala and great-grandson of Sūravira of the Paramāra family, it was supposed that Udayāditya belonged to a minor branch of the Paramāra clan and was a distant cousin of Bhoja. The present inscription which tses the word bhrātā to indicate the relationship leaves no doubt that Udayāditya was Bhoja's real brother, The evidence of the Udayapur inscription which is a very late record? has to be rejected in view 1 Above, Vol. XXII, pp. 54 f. * See, e.g., the Shërgadh insoription of Udayaditya, above, Vol. XXIII, pp. 132 ff. • Above, Vol. II, pp. 180 ff. • This view was first expressed by Prof. Kielhorn and has since been adopted by others. J. A. 8. B., Vol. IX, p. 549. . Above, Vol. XXII, p. 56. ? It is dated Vikrama Samvat 1562. See D. R. Bhandarkar's List of Inscriptions of Northern India, No. 124.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448