Book Title: Chicago Prashnottar Author(s): Vijayanandsuri Publisher: Atmanand Jain Pustak Pracharak MandalPage 58
________________ ( 42 ) you will again be driven on to either of the two fallacies of “Perverse Knowledge" and "Real Existence" alluded to above. I ask you again whether your belief in holding the phenomena as indescribable is based on direct or indirect proof. The direct proof shows the phenomena as they appear i. e., really existing. As are the objects, so is their cognition by direct proof and each object of the phenomena is existing in regard to its own form and non existent in regard to other objects. All these objects existing separately from one another form what is called Prapanchor Phenomena. This being the case how it is possible on the basis of direct evidence to prove the phenomena to be indescribable. 28. Q.- The direct evidence cannot rebut my former position on the other hand it strengthens it. If direct evidence were to show that the nature of one object does not exist in another object then it would weaken my position. The direct evidence is not of this naturePage Navigation
1 ... 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240