________________
( 42
)
you will again be driven on to either of the two fallacies of “Perverse Knowledge" and "Real Existence" alluded to above. I ask you again whether your belief in holding the phenomena as indescribable is based on direct or indirect proof. The direct proof shows the phenomena as they appear i. e., really existing. As are the objects, so is their cognition by direct proof and each object of the phenomena is existing in regard to its own form and non existent in regard to other objects. All these objects existing separately from one another form what is called Prapanchor Phenomena. This being the case how it is possible on the basis of direct evidence to prove the phenomena to be
indescribable. 28. Q.- The direct evidence cannot rebut my
former position on the other hand it strengthens it. If direct evidence were to show that the nature of one object does not exist in another object then it would weaken my position. The direct evidence is not of this nature
