Book Title: Jaina Philosophy Historical Outline
Author(s): Narendra Nath Bhattacharya
Publisher: Munshiram Manoharlal Publisher's Pvt Ltd New Delhi

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 60
________________ Introduction 39 mutilated contains an account of the life of Kharavela from his childhood to the thirteenth year of his reign. It begins with an appeal to the Arhat and Siddha, which corresponds to the beginning of the five-fold from of homage still used among the Jains, and mentions the building of temples in honour of the Arhat as well as an image of the first Jina, which was carried away by the Nanda king. The record shows that Khāravela invaded Magadha and brought back the statue of the Kalinga Jina taken away by the hostile king and that he provided shelters for Jain monks at the Relic Depository of the Arhats on the Kumari (Udayagiri) hill, erected many pillars and repaired old temples. The revised reading, however, does not mention the KalingaJina statue. The second and the smaller inscription states that Khāravela's wife caused a cave to be prepared for the ascetics of Kalinga who believed in the Arhats. The meaning of these inscriptions, which were formerly believed to be Buddhist, was first made clear by Dr. Bhagavanlal Indraji who recognised the true names of king Khāravela and his predecessors and pointed out that Kharavela and his wife were patrons of Jainism.1 From the beginning of the Christian era Mathura became one of the strongest centres of Jainism. The earliest inscription from Mathura, assigned to the first century BC by Indraji, tells of the erection of a small temple in honour of the Arhat Vardhamana and also of the dedication of seats for the teachers-a cistern and a stone table. This temple, the inscription says, stood by the side of one built, a guild of tradesmen. The ruins of a Jain Stupa as well as two temples have been excavated in the mound called Kankali Tilā. A second century inscription found therein says that the Stupa was built by the gods, indicating its legendary antiquity. Such inscriptions suggest that the Jains had erected Stupas since long, as also the Canon refers to them (thuva). The Stūpas upon which the figures of the Arhats were erected were supposed to have been the work of gods suggesting that they had been standing since time immemorial. A characteristic production of the Jains of Mathura was the ayagapata or 'tablet of homage.' These were sculptured tablets containing inscriptions. A large number of dedicatory inscriptions of the Kuṣaṇa age from Mathura have come to light. They are all on the pedestals of statues. In many of them the dedicators gave not only their own names, but also those 1Konow in 40, I, pp. 14-42. Jayaswal in JBORS, III-IV, Lüders, List 1345, Barua in IHQ, XIV, pp. 459-485.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242