Book Title: Jaina Philosophy Historical Outline
Author(s): Narendra Nath Bhattacharya
Publisher: Munshiram Manoharlal Publisher's Pvt Ltd New Delhi

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 74
________________ The Incipient Stage 53 by the supporters of anti-Vedism. In this connection we may refer to the Yaksas, Rakṣas and Nāgas, the pre-Vedic divinities,' whose cults were revived by the followers of Buddhism and Jainism. Here we may take a very interesting example. In the epics and Purāņas in which the Vedic religious and cultural traditions are zealously upheld, the Rākṣasas are depicted as terrible beings and dangerous enemies, regarded as the embodiment of all evil and treated with much opprobrium and insult. But the very term by which they were designated has a different significance. The root rakṣa from which the term Rākṣasa has been derived denotes a protector. Thus the Rākṣasa is one who protects. Were they the protectors of the indigenous beliefs, cults and rituals from the encroaching hands of an alien religious system? The facts about their material culture and social institutions, their religious beliefs and practices, their adherence to certain moral values and the favours and privileges they used to obtain from the non-Vedic Śiva and Devi, as we find in these texts, obviously lead us to such a conclusion. The most striking fact about their activiteis is that they were opposed to the sacrificial religion of the Vedas. In every case we find them destroying the Vedic sacrifices and creating havoc among their participants. They did not even hesitate to kill the sages. When Ghatotkaca, the son of Bhima by a Rākṣasi, sacrificed his life in favour of the Pandavas in the Bharata war, Kṛṣua, the friend, philosopher and guide of the Pāṇḍavas, did not hide his feeling of joy. He was so pleased and excited that he began to dance like an irresponsible person, although Ghatotkaca was the son of his friend. When Kṛṣṇa was questioned about this unseemly behaviour, he categorically replied that he was indeed happy because Ghatotkaca, though begotten by his friend, was basically a Rākṣasa, and as such was a great enemy of the Vedic way of life and of the sacrificial cult. It is therefore evident that such declared enemies must receive an honourable position in the anti-Vedic systems like Buddhism or Jainism. The cult of the primitive Mother Goddesses was also revived in the Buddhist and Jain pantheon for the same reason. The popularity of these goddesses among the agricultural peoples and that of the rituals by which they were characterised-the so-called primitive Tantric 1See Coomaraswamy, Y. 'Mbh., VII pp. 180-81, P.C. Ray's Eng. tr. pp. 421-24. 'See my HSR, pp. 38-42, 45-47, 65-68, 90-92, 114,

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242