In Search of the Original Ardhamagadhi English Translation

Author(s): K R Chandra, N M Kansara, Nagin J Shah, Ramniklal M Shah
Publisher: Prakrit Text Society Ahmedabad

Page 51

ARCHAIC LINGUISTIC ELEMENTS IN THE ARDHAMAGADHI
(L)
paogaso (Isibhā 24.37), bahuso (Ācā. 1.9.4.17) savvaso (Ācā. 1.9.1.12, 16, 18) Similar usages are found in the Pāli Suttanipāta also, e.g.,
puthuso (50.14,15), sabbaso (53.6,16) Forms of Genitive Singular : (1) Present Participle -
karao (kurvatah) Ācā. 1.1.1.4, aviyānao (variant a vijānato = avijanatah, Ācā. 1.1.6.49; also see Sūtra Nos. 144, 148, 149, 154). Forms quoted by Pischel (396) are : viharao, akuvvao, haṇao, kittayao; vippayahato can be quoted from the Isibhā. 16, p. 33.20
(2) Forms of Words Ending in Consonants (Gen. Sing.) :
dhimato (dhīmatah) Isibhā 9.15
dhiīmao, mahao (mahatah), bhagavao (bhagavatah) (Pischel, 396) jasassino (Pischel, 405) The Older Nominal suffix '-mhin and '-mhi' of Locative Singular :
(1) The evolution of the case-suffixes '-mhim' and'-mhi' has been from Sanskrit case-suffix -smin'. The termination -mhi'is found in the Western Ashokan Inscriptions. Later on.-mmi' termination has evolved from this ‘-mhi'. The Locative singular suffixes in Pāli are '-smim' and '-mhi', which should be noted in this context.
The Preserved Usages of '-mhi' and '-mhin' in the Ardhamāgadhī Works:
imamhi (Vyavahārasūtra, 7.22, 23) kamhiṁ (Uttarādhyayana, 15.2 Alsdorf)'
(M)
34