Book Title: Ethical Doctrines in Jainism Author(s): Kamalchand Sogani Publisher: Jain Sanskruti Samrakshak Sangh SolapurPage 39
________________ METAPHYSICAL BASIS OF JAINA ETHICS 17 fluxism and the Charybdis of illusionism?". Thus nature of substance may now oblige us to think that things both material and mental are everlastingly existent. Such a view of things cannot even pretend to conceive without falling into inconsistency the intervention of any eternal and self-subsistent maker, either personal or impersonal, for bringing into existence the diverse things of the world. SUBSTANCE AND QUALITY: Substance as different from the general and specific qualities and modifications is not worthy of being so called. Things devoid of attributes and modifications are nothing but abstractions, and are unthinkable. Qualities are incapable of being existent by themselves even for a moment. They necessitate the simultaneous existence of substance, and are denied any isolated character; and they are themselves bereft of qualities. “Qualities do not fly loose as abstract entities, and substance does not exist as an undetermined somewhat, a mere 'that' to which they are afterwards attached. The idea of substance is the idea of qualities as unified and systematised8”. As regards the relation between them, we may say that they are non-separate and non-identical. Non-separateness results owing to their subsistence in the same spatial existense, and non-identity issues because of the fact that one is not the other. The assertion that substance is not quality and that quality is not substance serves only to emphasize the nonidentical character of both substance and quality. It does not mean the absolute negation of substance in quality and vice-versa. Thus the relation between Dravya and Guna (substance and quality) is one of identity-in-difference. The difference between them is only the difference in point of nomenclature, number, characterisation, and purpose and not difference with reference to spatial extense. “Neither being found without the other, they both stand in the relation of invariable concomitance or simultaneity with one another instead of being in relation of antecedence and consequence in time”. In other words, "the relation between substance and quality is one of coeval identity, unity, inseparability, and essential simplicity, the unity of substance and quality is not the result of union or combination?.” Jaina Philosophy of Non-absolutism. p. 72. 3 Idea of God. p. 159. Cf. Sarvärtha p. 310. S Aptamimaṁsā. 72. 7 Indian Philosophy. Vol. I. p. 314. 2 Tasi. V. 41. Prava. II. 16. 6 Epitome of Jainism. p. 24. Jain Education International For Personal & Private Use Only www.jainelibrary.orgPage Navigation
1 ... 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322