Book Title: Sambodhi
Author(s): Dalsukh Malvania, H C Bhayani, Nagin J Shah
Publisher: L D Indology Ahmedabad

Previous | Next

Page 199
________________ Review 89 But it is understood that whenever Vacana writers say that, Bhaktasthala is also real, it means not permanently real but appears to be real in the beginning on account of Avidyā but vanishes in the final stage of Aikyasthala, where there is no duality between Bhakta and God. Bhaktasthala is only a ladder, not permant reality. Again, the author in some other place (p.102), makes certain contradictory statememts. He says that Virasaiva does not preach cessation of actions and does not believe in the doctrine of Karma', in the very next sentence, he states that "Niskāmakarma must be performed which does not bind the jiva." Nişkāmakarma is definitely connected with the theory. of Karma. On the whole this book is eminenty readable. It gives complete picture of Virasaivism: its early history, rituals and philosophy. This is the first authoritative crital exposition of Virasaiva Sect based on an indepth study of original Sanskrit and Kannada sources. Attention is diawn to the influence of Advaita, Mahāyāna and Jainism on Virasaivism. Apendix given by the author is very useful for research students and specialists. The book is critically edited, well-printed and the get up is very attractive. The price is also within the reach of individuals and institutions. Y. S. Shastri Buddhist Wisdom - The Mystery of the Self-by George Grimm, translated by Carroll Aikins, ed. by M, Keller Grimm, Motilal Banarasidass, Delhi, 1978, pp.70, Price Rs.25/ The book under review is from the pen of a great Buddhist Scholar, George Grimm. This book is originally written in German, translated by Carroll Aikins. The doctrine of self is one of the most controversial probleins in the history of Buddhist thought. Two kinds of opinion are prevalent among the scholars on this matter. Some think that Buddha denied the existence of Soul and this non-Soul theory (anātmavāda) demarcates Buddhism from Vedāntic philosophy. Some others think that Buddha did not deny existence of true Self, but he only denied the empirical self i.e. ego, associated with ahamkāra. The second view seems to be more appropriate and comes nearesc to the original teaching of the Buddha. Buddha denied the ego-self, which is root-cause of desire, passion, attachement and misery. 'Dharma' which is ultimate Reality called by Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304