Book Title: Jaina Philosophy of Non Absolutism
Author(s): Satkari Mookerjee, S N Dasgupta
Publisher: Motilal Banarasidas

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 203
________________ Relations 181 the consequent, unattahed to the antecedent. But the observation of the consequent as following upon the antecedent, and the absence of observation of the consequent in the absence of the antecedent are interpreted as a relation of causality. The observation of concomitance in agreement and in difference is thus the only thing that can be posited as an actual truth, and the imposition of a relation between the antecedent and consequent events is only a subjective necessity of thought. The two events are not in reality related; and the conceptual relation, though it may be inevitable for our thought, is unreal and false as an estimation of objective truth. Dharmakirti is positive that this conceptual relation occurs spontaneously in the mind of the observing subject and is not the result of a schooling received from a teacher, 1 It is worthy of remark that the Buddhist philosopher here anticipates Kant who may be regarded rather as a commentator and elaborator of the Buddhist position in this regard. It follows as a legitimate conclusion that all our judg nts are false, as the relation of terms is only a subjective construction according to Dharmakirti and Kant alike. Dharmakirti pursues the examination further. If, again, the relation were different from the terms, standing alongside of and aloof from them, how could the terms, e.g., cause and effect, be brought together? The impossibility of exchange of beneficiary services between the terms makes the relation a chimera and the recognition of this fact knocks out the pretensions of all other relations posited by philosophers. If things could be supposed to be related in spite of the lack of reciprocal services, there would be no logical bar to the postulation of a relation between anything and everything. The reciprocity of services is thus the conditio sine quâ non of objective relation, and we have seen that the condition cannot be fulfilled in causation. What is found to be true of causality is true of 1. paśyan nekam adrstasya darśane tadadarśane, apaśyat käryam anveti vină vyākhātsbhir, janaḥ, darśanādarśane muktvå käryabuddher asambhavāt. käryädiśrutir apy atra lāghavärtha nivesită . . . . . etāvanmātratattvārtha-kāryakāraṇagocară”. Vikalpă darśayanty arthăn mithyārthả ghatitān iva. ibid., p. 510. 2. tayor anupakāre 'pi samavāye paratra vă. sambandho yadi, viśvam syåt samavāyi parasparam. ibid. p. 510. Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314